RWM ranks 4th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs RWM
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
RWM 440.7×the volume
68.1K30M
QQQD vs RWM Performance
−0.7%−10.2%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- RWM 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- RWM $163M
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- RWM −10.2%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- QQQD 3
- RWM 3
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- QQQD $12.18
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | C43 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | D38 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
RWMB
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs RWM Cost
Overpaying RWM vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | RWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs RWM Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- QQQD $0.41
- RWM $0.48
- QQQD $0.10
- RWM $0.09
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%RWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14RWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%RWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35RWM −1.23
QQQD and RWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
