DOG ranks 1st and TWM 17th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs TWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 6.5×the volume
4.77M736K
DOG +15.6pt
−10.9%−26.5%
DOG vs TWM Performance
−20.7%−55.8%
- DOG 0.95%
- TWM 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- TWM $56M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- TWM −23.8%
- DOG 3.15%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- DOG 3
- TWM 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- TWM 736K sh
- DOG $22.02
- TWM $23.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97Higher | A88 |
| Risk | B65Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | C43 | B63Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and TWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
TWMC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
TWM The double-strength small-cap bear trade, running since 2007: TWM aims for two times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and resets every day. Built for short holds, by design.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
TWM The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance. It is not designed to achieve that inverse target over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs TWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs TWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
TWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%TWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs TWM Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- DOG $0.69
- TWM $0.93
- DOG $0.17
- TWM $0.18
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- TWM Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- TWM Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- TWM Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs TWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- TWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterTWM 36.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21TWM −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterTWM −77.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83TWM −2.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.