PSQ ranks 3rd and TWM 17th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
PSQ vs TWM
74.1%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
PSQ 17.6×the volume
13M736K
PSQ +8.5pt
−18.0%−26.5%
PSQ vs TWM Performance
−42.7%−55.8%
- PSQ 0.95%
- TWM 0.95%
- PSQ $611M
- TWM $56M
- PSQ −7.0%, better
- TWM −23.8%
- PSQ 3.90%, better
- TWM 3.87%
- PSQ 4
- TWM 1
- PSQ 13M sh, better
- TWM 736K sh
- PSQ $26.64
- TWM $23.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSQ | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A88 |
| Risk | B59Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A98Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B55 | B63Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. PSQ and TWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSQB
TWMC
In short
PSQ The plain short on the Nasdaq-100: PSQ aims for -1x the index's daily move, with no leverage multiplier bolted on. It has been running since 2006, making it one of the original one-for-one bear tools.
TWM The double-strength small-cap bear trade, running since 2007: TWM aims for two times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and resets every day. Built for short holds, by design.
Stated mandate
PSQ The fund is designed to provide -1x exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index's daily price movement, seeking to benefit when that index declines.
TWM The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance. It is not designed to achieve that inverse target over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSQ vs TWM Holdings
How PSQ and TWM differ
74.1%
Shared holdings make up 100% of TWM and 74.1% of PSQ.
Level by level
- Holdings74.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in PSQMore in TWM | PSQ | TWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PSQMore in TWM | PSQ | TWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PSQ115.2%
- TWM107.7%
- PSQ4
- TWM1
Asset class
- PSQ
- Equity
- TWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PSQ3
- In both1
- Only in TWM0
Only in PSQ
3 securities, 41.1% of PSQ by weight
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-1017.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2917.93%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-175.25%
Only in TWM
0 securities, 0.0% of TWM by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in PSQMore in TWM | PSQ | TWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf | TWM +33.66 points | 74.06% | 107.72% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSQ vs TWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSQ 0.95%
$17,869
TWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSQ | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%PSQ
- 0.95%TWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
PSQ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
PSQ vs TWM Dividends
- PSQ 3.90%, better
- TWM 3.87%
- PSQ $1.04
- TWM $0.93
- PSQ $0.26
- TWM $0.18
- PSQ Sep 23, 2026
- TWM Sep 23, 2026
- PSQ Sep 29, 2026
- TWM Sep 29, 2026
- PSQ Quarterly
- TWM Quarterly
Distribution history
PSQ vs TWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PSQ
- TWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSQ 16.8%, betterTWM 36.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSQ −1.33TWM −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- PSQ −61.5%, betterTWM −77.4%
- Market sensitivity
- PSQ −1.18TWM −2.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.