TWM ranks 17th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs TWM
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
TWM 10.8×the volume
68.1K736K
QQQD vs TWM Performance
−0.7%−23.8%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- TWM 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- TWM $56M
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- TWM −23.8%
- QQQD 3.35%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- QQQD 3
- TWM 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- TWM 736K sh, better
- QQQD $12.18
- TWM $23.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | TWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | C43 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | D38 | B65Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and TWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
TWMC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TWM The double-strength small-cap bear trade, running since 2007: TWM aims for two times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and resets every day. Built for short holds, by design.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
TWM The Fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance. It is not designed to achieve that inverse target over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs TWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs TWM Cost
Overpaying TWM vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
TWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | TWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%TWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
TWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs TWM Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%
- TWM 3.87%, better
- QQQD $0.41
- TWM $0.93
- QQQD $0.10
- TWM $0.18
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- TWM Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- TWM Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Quarterly
- TWM Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQD vs TWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%TWM 36.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14TWM −1.01
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%TWM −77.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35TWM −2.43
QQQD and TWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
