SRET ranks 4th and DVDN 5th of 6 funds in the Real Estate Sector Category.
DVDN vs SRET
SRET −0.32pt a year
0.90%0.58%
SRET 14.9×the volume
2.72K40.5K
SRET +19.5pt
−9.5%+10.0%
DVDN vs SRET Performance
−25.2%+2.2%
- DVDN 0.90%
- SRET 0.58%, better
- DVDN $3M
- SRET $199M
- DVDN −25.2%
- SRET +2.2%, better
- DVDN 16.10%, better
- SRET 9.38%
- DVDN 18
- SRET 35
- DVDN 2.72K sh
- SRET 40.5K sh, better
- DVDN $12.83
- SRET $20.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DVDN | SRET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | D39Higher |
| Mission | A87Higher | A79 |
| Risk | F20 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | C42Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | B68Higher |
| Durability | D38 | B67Higher |
Rank among Real Estate Sector funds
Same Category. DVDN and SRET are both graded against the same 6 Real Estate Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DVDND
SRETB
In short
DVDN A boutique, genuinely active take on dividend investing: at least 80% of assets in companies that paid a dividend last year, run through a value-leaning, multi-stage selection process. Small, young (2023), and priced at 0.90%.
SRET Most global real estate ETFs rank landlords by size. SRET flips it: a tight basket of about 29 REITs worldwide chosen off a SuperDividend yield screen, paid out monthly. A yield-first take in a market-cap-first cohort.
Stated mandate
DVDN The Fund seeks its objective by investing at least 80% of its assets, under normal conditions, in companies that paid a dividend during the preceding year.
SRET SRET seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend ® REIT Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DVDN vs SRET Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DVDN vs SRET Cost
Overpaying DVDN vs SRET
$5,587
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DVDN 0.90%
$17,040
SRET 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DVDN | SRET | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $1,041 | $552 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,986 | $2,029 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $11,453 | $5,587 |
- 0.90%DVDN
- 0.58%SRET, cheaper
- Middle half of Real Estate Sector funds
- Median 0.53%
SRET 4th cheapest of 6 funds
DVDN 5th cheapest of 6 funds
DVDN vs SRET Dividends
- DVDN 16.10%, better
- SRET 9.38%
- DVDN $2.08
- SRET $1.90
- DVDN $0.49
- SRET $0.19
- DVDN Oct 8, 2026
- SRET Oct 5, 2026
- DVDN Oct 9, 2026
- SRET Oct 13, 2026
- DVDN Quarterly
- SRET Monthly
Distribution history
DVDN vs SRET Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DVDN 15.7%SRET 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DVDN −1.04SRET 0.48
- Worst fall
- DVDN −44.4%SRET −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DVDN 0.63SRET 0.87
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.