Skip to content

DVLU vs VONV

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF

DVLUCNasdaq

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.54pt a year

DVLU0.60%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 152.8×the volume

DVLU5.08KVONV776K

5Y return · a year

VONV +1.4pt

DVLU+10.3%VONV+11.7%

DVLU vs VONV Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+63.2%DVLU+73.9%VONV

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. DVLU +63.2%. VONV +73.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DVLU 0.60%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
DVLU $46M
VONV $21.7B
1Y total return
DVLU +14.4%
VONV +30.6%, better
Yield (12M)
DVLU 0.79%
VONV 1.51%, better
Holdings
DVLU 51
VONV 887
Avg volume (30D)
DVLU 5.08K sh
VONV 776K sh, better
NAV per share
DVLU $37.94
VONV $112.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DVLU: Cost 15, Risk 30, Mission 86, Tradability 41, Holdings 37, Durability 44. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 89, Mission 100, Tradability 59, Holdings 49, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for DVLU, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDVLUVONV
Cost30% weightF15A96Higher
Mission25% weightA86A100Higher
Risk15% weightD30A89Higher
Tradability15% weightC41B59Higher
Holdings10% weightD37C49Higher
Durability5% weightC44A92Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DVLU and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and DVLU 80th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 80CCPTLGlobal X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETFScore 42
  4. Rank 80CDVLUFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 80CFSCSFirst Trust SMID Capital Strength ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DVLUCFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

DVLU Value and momentum usually pull in opposite directions. DVLU's Dorsey Wright index tries to own the overlap, packing it into about 50 US stocks. A niche, higher-cost take on factor investing that has been running since 2018.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

DVLU The Fund seeks to track the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus ValueTM Index before fees and expenses, normally investing at least 90% of net assets in its equity securities.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • DVLU Momentum and value ride in one rules-based index rather than two separate funds. At about 50 US stocks, it can look genuinely different from a plain value benchmark.ftportfolios.com
  • The Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Value Index picks the names, not a manager's gut. Live since 2018, so there is a real multi-cycle record to inspect.
  • The mandate is tight: normally at least 90% of net assets sit in the index's own stocks, so you get the strategy on the tin. Distributions come quarterly.ftportfolios.com
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • DVLU At 0.60% a year, it runs well above the typical US multifactor fund's 0.32%, and shelf heavyweights like VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%) charge a fraction of it.
  • A small fund that trades thinly. That usually means wider bid-ask spreads and more attention needed on order entry than with the category's giants.
  • About 50 names and a factor blend that can get whipsawed when market leadership turns. Results can diverge sharply from a broad value index, in both directions.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full DVLU profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

DVLU vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DVLU vs VONV Cost

Overpaying DVLU vs VONV

$10,547

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DVLU 0.60%

    $11,817

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DVLU 0.60%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530DVLU $11,817VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearDVLUVONVOverpaying
10$1,076$110$966
20$4,116$432$3,684
30$11,817$1,270$10,547

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%DVLU
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

DVLU 82nd cheapest of 99 funds

DVLU vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
DVLU 0.79%
VONV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
DVLU $0.30
VONV $1.74
Last payment
DVLU $0.09
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
DVLU Sep 24, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
DVLU Sep 30, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
DVLU Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DVLUQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll DVLU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2018 $0.09; Mar 21, 2019 $0.04; Jun 14, 2019 $0.08; Sep 25, 2019 $0.12; Dec 13, 2019 $0.10; Mar 26, 2020 $0.08; Jun 25, 2020 $0.03; Sep 24, 2020 $0.05; Dec 24, 2020 $0.07; Mar 25, 2021 $0.03; Jun 24, 2021 $0.10; Sep 23, 2021 $0.07; Dec 23, 2021 $0.13; Mar 25, 2022 $0.08; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 23, 2022 $0.08; Dec 23, 2022 $0.20; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.08; Sep 22, 2023 $0.03; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 21, 2024 $0.04; Jun 27, 2024 $0.08; Sep 26, 2024 $0.04; Dec 13, 2024 $0.14; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.07; Sep 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 12, 2025 $0.09; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

DVLU vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DVLU
  • VONV
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: DVLU −24.9% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DVLU 18.1%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DVLU 1.02VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DVLU −24.9%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DVLU 1.19VONV 0.85

DVLU and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DVLUCvsILCVA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DVLUCvsVYMA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DVLUCvsDCORA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsDCORA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · U.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class Shares

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.