Skip to content

DVOL vs VONV

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF

DVOLDNasdaq

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.54pt a year

DVOL0.60%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 119.1×the volume

DVOL6.5KVONV774K

5Y return · a year

VONV +6.6pt

DVOL+5.1%VONV+11.7%

DVOL vs VONV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.1%DVOL+73.8%VONV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. DVOL +28.1%. VONV +73.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DVOL 0.60%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
DVOL $75M
VONV $23.3B
1Y total return
DVOL +6.1%
VONV +28.5%, better
Yield (12M)
DVOL 0.81%
VONV 1.53%, better
Holdings
DVOL 51
VONV 873
Avg volume (30D)
DVOL 6.5K sh
VONV 774K sh, better
NAV per share
DVOL $36.35
VONV $113.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DVOL: Cost 15, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 37, Durability 46. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 86, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for DVOL, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDVOLVONV
Cost30% weightF15A96Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightC50A86Higher
Tradability15% weightC42B60Higher
Holdings10% weightD37C49Higher
Durability5% weightC46A93Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DVOL and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and DVOL 91st of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 91DBRNYBurney U.S. Factor Rotation ETFScore 32
  4. Rank 91DDVOLFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETFScore 32
  5. Rank 93DFDLSInspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DVOLDFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

DVOL Momentum and low volatility usually pull in opposite directions. DVOL runs both screens through a Dorsey Wright index and lands on roughly 50 stocks that are climbing without much drama. A niche recipe, priced like one at 0.60%.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

DVOL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low VolatilityTM Index.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • DVOL Two factors, one ticket: the index screens for momentum and low volatility together instead of asking you to own a fund for each and hope they blend.ftportfolios.com
  • Roughly 50 names, not 500. The factor tilt actually shows up in the portfolio instead of being watered down by hundreds of index leftovers.
  • Live since 2018, so the rules have traded through real market shocks rather than existing only as a backtest.
  • A published index calls the shots and cash goes out quarterly. No manager improvising between rebalances.ftportfolios.com
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • DVOL The 0.60% fee sits well above the typical multifactor fund. Large peers like VONV and FNDX charge a fraction of that, and the gap comes straight out of results.
  • Volume is light for the category, so spreads and trade timing matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • With about 50 holdings, individual names and whichever sectors currently clear the screen carry real weight versus a broad-market fund.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full DVOL profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

DVOL vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DVOL vs VONV Cost

Overpaying DVOL vs VONV

$10,547

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DVOL 0.60%

    $11,817

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DVOL 0.60%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530DVOL $11,817VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearDVOLVONVOverpaying
10$1,076$110$966
20$4,116$432$3,684
30$11,817$1,270$10,547

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%DVOL
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

DVOL 82nd cheapest of 99 funds

DVOL vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DVOL 0.81%
VONV 1.53%, better
Payout (12M)
DVOL $0.29
VONV $1.74
Last payment
DVOL $0.07
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
DVOL Sep 24, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
DVOL Sep 30, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
DVOL Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DVOLQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll DVOL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2018 $0.07; Mar 21, 2019 $0.06; Jun 14, 2019 $0.08; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 13, 2019 $0.19; Mar 26, 2020 $0.05; Jun 25, 2020 $0.08; Sep 24, 2020 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2020 $0.0094; Mar 25, 2021 $0.01; Jun 24, 2021 $0.03; Sep 23, 2021 $0.04; Dec 23, 2021 $0.07; Mar 25, 2022 $0.04; Jun 24, 2022 $0.07; Sep 23, 2022 $0.10; Dec 23, 2022 $0.14; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.09; Sep 22, 2023 $0.03; Dec 22, 2023 $0.13; Mar 21, 2024 $0.05; Jun 27, 2024 $0.04; Sep 26, 2024 $0.02; Dec 13, 2024 $0.11; Mar 27, 2025 $0.09; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 25, 2025 $0.05; Dec 12, 2025 $0.10; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 24, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

DVOL vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DVOL
  • VONV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: DVOL −24.6% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DVOL 12.6%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DVOL 0.79VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DVOL −24.6%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DVOL 0.69VONV 0.85

DVOL and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DVOLDvsILCVA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DVOLDvsVYMA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DVOLDvsIMCVA

    First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.