RWM ranks 4th and DXD 10th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DXD vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 13.4×the volume
2.23M30M
RWM +13.2pt
−24.5%−11.3%
DXD vs RWM Performance
−51.5%−15.9%
- DXD 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- DXD $42M
- RWM $163M
- DXD −14.0%
- RWM −10.1%, better
- DXD 3.61%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- DXD 3
- RWM 3
- DXD 2.23M sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- DXD $17.67
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DXD | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C49 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A86 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | B63Higher |
| Durability | B62 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DXD and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DXDB
RWMB
In short
DXD A 2006 original. DXD aims for twice the inverse of the Dow's daily move, resetting the clock every single day. Think of it as the double-strength version of the Dow bear trade, engineered for days, not quarters.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
DXD DXD seeks daily, pre-expense returns equal to approximately twice the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance. It is designed to rise when the Index falls and decline when the Index rises.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DXD vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DXD vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DXD 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DXD | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DXD
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DXD 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DXD vs RWM Dividends
- DXD 3.61%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- DXD $0.63
- RWM $0.48
- DXD $0.15
- RWM $0.09
- DXD Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- DXD Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- DXD Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
DXD vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DXD
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DXD 23.2%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DXD −1.21RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- DXD −68.7%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DXD −1.66RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.