FLJH ranks 3rd and DXJ 10th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
DXJ vs FLJH
FLJH −0.39pt a year
0.48%0.09%
DXJ 23.7×the volume
814K34.3K
DXJ +5.0pt
+25.6%+20.6%
DXJ vs FLJH Performance
+213.0%+154.7%
- DXJ 0.48%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- DXJ $7.05B
- FLJH $201M
- DXJ +30.6%, better
- FLJH +22.5%
- DXJ
- FLJH 6.17%
- DXJ 490
- FLJH 448
- DXJ 814K sh, better
- FLJH 34.3K sh
- DXJ $58.90
- FLJH $44.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DXJ | FLJH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | C48 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | C53 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. DXJ and FLJH are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DXJB
FLJHA
In short
DXJ Japanese stocks with the yen taken out of the math. DXJ has run its hedged, dividend-screened index since 2006, pairing roughly 400 Japanese companies with a hedge against yen-dollar swings.
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
Stated mandate
DXJ The fund seeks to track the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, providing Japanese equity exposure while reducing the effect of yen-dollar currency movements.
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DXJ vs FLJH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DXJ vs FLJH Cost
Overpaying DXJ vs FLJH
$7,707
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DXJ 0.48%
$9,605
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DXJ | FLJH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $165 | $700 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $646 | $2,682 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $1,898 | $7,707 |
- 0.48%DXJ
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
DXJ 6th cheapest of 18 funds
DXJ vs FLJH Dividends
- DXJ
- FLJH 6.17%
- DXJ
- FLJH $2.74
- DXJ $0.03
- FLJH $0.29
- DXJ Sep 25, 2026
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- DXJ Sep 29, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- DXJ Quarterly
- FLJH Twice a year
Distribution history
DXJ vs FLJH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DXJ
- FLJH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DXJ 12.4%, betterFLJH 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DXJ 1.71, betterFLJH 1.59
- Worst fall
- DXJ −22.2%FLJH −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DXJ 0.48FLJH 0.62
DXJ and FLJH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


