Skip to content
etf.net

DXUV vs PRF

U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares

DXUVANYSE Arca

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF

PRFBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DXUV −0.09pt a year

DXUV0.25%PRF0.34%

Avg volume · 30D

PRF 5.0×the volume

DXUV61KPRF307K

DXUV vs PRF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.3%DXUV+24.7%PRF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DXUV +18.3%. PRF +24.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DXUV 0.25%, better
PRF 0.34%
Fund size
DXUV $6.24B
PRF $10.1B
1Y total return
DXUV +18.3%
PRF +24.7%, better
Yield (12M)
DXUV 0.96%
PRF 1.32%, better
Holdings
DXUV 2271
PRF 995
Avg volume (30D)
DXUV 61K sh
PRF 307K sh, better
NAV per share
DXUV $68.67
PRF $56.12
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DXUV: Cost 66, Risk 72, Mission 97, Tradability 34, Holdings 72, Durability 67. PRF: Cost 43, Risk 90, Mission 67, Tradability 78, Holdings 78, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for DXUV, PRF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDXUVPRF
Cost30% weightB66HigherC43
Mission25% weightA97HigherB67
Risk15% weightA72A90Higher
Tradability15% weightD34A78Higher
Holdings10% weightA72A78Higher
Durability5% weightB67A75Higher

Rank among US Factor Index funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DXUV and PRF are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Factor Index⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

DXUV ranks 4th and PRF 8th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AMGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AUSCAXtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3ASIZEiShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ADXUVU.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class SharesScore 70
  5. Rank 5ASUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 7BSPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETFScore 67
  7. Rank 8BPRFInvesco RAFI US 1000 ETFScore 66
  8. Rank 9BMMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DXUVAU.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares

PRFBInvesco RAFI US 1000 ETF

In short

DXUV No data

PRF PRF throws out market cap. Since 2005 it has weighted about 1,000 big US companies by book value, cash flow, sales and dividends, so a holding's size reflects its business footprint rather than its share price.

Stated mandate

DXUV No data

PRF The Fund seeks to track the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, which selects large US equities using fundamental measures such as book value, cash flow, sales and dividends.

Why people hold it

DXUV No data

  • PRF Position sizes come from sales, cash flow, book value and dividends, so the fund leans away from names as their prices climb and back toward them as prices fall.
  • Trading since 2005 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund: a long-running strategy with a record across full market cycles, not a recent launch.
  • About 1,000 US companies deep, so the fundamental tilt is spread across many small weight differences instead of a handful of concentrated bets.
  • Lands in the upper half of its US factor peer group, with its risk profile one of the sturdier parts of the package.

Worth knowing

DXUV No data

  • PRF At 0.34% a year it prices above the typical US factor ETF, and well above cheap cap-weighted value peers such as MGV at 0.05%.
  • Fundamental weighting holds richly priced mega caps at smaller weights than a cap-weighted index does, so this fund's path can look very different for years at a stretch.
  • Income arrives quarterly, and trading activity is moderate rather than heavy, which can matter on larger orders.

Full DXUV profile⁠

Full PRF profile⁠

DXUV vs PRF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DXUV vs PRF Cost

Overpaying PRF vs DXUV

$1,773

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DXUV 0.25%

    $5,159

  • PRF 0.34%

    $6,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DXUV 0.25%
  • PRF 0.34%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530PRF $6,932DXUV $5,159

Year by year

YearDXUVPRFOverpaying
10$455$616$161
20$1,769$2,386$617
30$5,159$6,932$1,773

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%DXUV, cheaper
  • 0.34%PRF
  • Middle half of US Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.30%

DXUV 10th cheapest of 30 funds

PRF 17th cheapest of 30 funds

DXUV vs PRF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DXUV 0.96%
PRF 1.32%, better
Payout (12M)
DXUV $0.66
PRF $0.74
Last payment
DXUV $0.16
PRF $0.19
Ex-dividend
DXUV Sep 22, 2026
PRF Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
DXUV Sep 24, 2026
PRF Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
DXUV Quarterly
PRF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

DXUVQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll DXUV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2024 $0.20; Mar 25, 2025 $0.11; Jun 24, 2025 $0.15; Sep 23, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.19; Mar 24, 2026 $0.14; Jun 23, 2026 $0.17; Sep 22, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
PRFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll PRF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.02; Jun 16, 2017 $0.10; Sep 18, 2017 $0.12; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Mar 19, 2018 $0.07; Jun 18, 2018 $0.13; Sep 24, 2018 $0.13; Dec 24, 2018 $0.13; Mar 18, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.13; Sep 23, 2019 $0.14; Dec 23, 2019 $0.15; Mar 23, 2020 $0.15; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.12; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 22, 2021 $0.13; Jun 21, 2021 $0.11; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.16; Mar 21, 2022 $0.15; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.16; Dec 19, 2022 $0.16; Mar 20, 2023 $0.17; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Sep 18, 2023 $0.16; Dec 18, 2023 $0.18; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.17; Sep 23, 2024 $0.19; Dec 23, 2024 $0.20; Mar 24, 2025 $0.19; Jun 23, 2025 $0.18; Sep 22, 2025 $0.19; Dec 22, 2025 $0.19; Mar 23, 2026 $0.18; Jun 22, 2026 $0.18; Sep 21, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

DXUV vs PRF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DXUV 12.8%since Oct 2024PRF 11.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DXUV 0.82since Oct 2024PRF 1.54
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DXUV −21.1%since Sep 2024PRF −19.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DXUV 0.94PRF 0.89

Popular comparisons

  • DXUVAvsMGVA

    U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares · Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PRFBvsMGVA

    Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DXUVAvsUSCAA

    U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares · Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PRFBvsUSCAA

    Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF · Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DXUVAvsSIZEA

    U.S. Vector Equity Portfolio ETF Class Shares · iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PRFBvsSIZEA

    Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF · iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.