DYNF ranks 4th and WBIL 98th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DYNF vs WBIL
DYNF −1.44pt a year
0.26%1.70%
DYNF 618.2×the volume
2.25M3.65K
DYNF +8.4pt
+13.8%+5.4%
DYNF vs WBIL Performance
+90.9%+30.1%
- DYNF 0.26%, better
- WBIL 1.70%
- DYNF $41.8B
- WBIL $29M
- DYNF +11.6%, better
- WBIL +11.0%
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- WBIL 0.04%
- DYNF 264
- WBIL 52
- DYNF 2.25M sh, better
- WBIL 3.65K sh
- DYNF $67.32
- WBIL $39.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DYNF | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A97Higher | B55 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DYNF and WBIL are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DYNFA
WBILD
In short
DYNF Most factor funds make you pick a lane: value, momentum, quality. DYNF rotates across five styles instead, letting a factor model decide which one leads, and charges an index-fund-ish 0.26% to do it.
WBIL Most equity funds ride the drop out. WBIL is built to sell into it: nightly quality screens pick the names, a tightening trailing stop decides when they go, and cash counts as a position. An active, risk-managed spin on the Russell 3000 universe, priced accordingly.
Stated mandate
DYNF The Fund seeks to outperform the U.S. equity market through diversified, tactical exposure to style factors using a factor rotation model.
WBIL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and potential current income while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DYNF vs WBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DYNF vs WBIL Cost
Overpaying WBIL vs DYNF
$23,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DYNF 0.26%
$5,358
WBIL 1.70%
$29,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DYNF | WBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $2,911 | $2,438 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $10,606 | $8,768 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $29,041 | $23,683 |
- 0.26%DYNF, cheaper
- 1.70%WBIL
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DYNF 18th cheapest of 121 funds
WBIL 117th cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF vs WBIL Dividends
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- WBIL 0.04%
- DYNF $0.56
- WBIL $0.02
- DYNF $0.14
- WBIL $0.02
- DYNF Sep 15, 2026
- WBIL Dec 18, 2025
- DYNF Sep 18, 2026
- WBIL Dec 19, 2025
- DYNF Quarterly
- WBIL Irregular
Distribution history
DYNF vs WBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DYNF
- WBIL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DYNF 13.1%, betterWBIL 14.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DYNF 1.55, betterWBIL 0.52
- Worst fall
- DYNF −26.9%WBIL −25.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DYNF 1.02WBIL 1.19
DYNF and WBIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

