DYNF ranks 4th and XCHG 44th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DYNF vs XCHG
DYNF −0.24pt a year
0.26%0.50%
DYNF 1264.5×the volume
2.25M1.78K
DYNF vs XCHG Performance
+10.6%+8.5%
- DYNF 0.26%, better
- XCHG 0.50%
- DYNF $41.8B
- XCHG $705M
- DYNF +10.7%
- XCHG
- DYNF 0.84%
- XCHG
- DYNF 264
- XCHG 580
- DYNF 2.25M sh, better
- XCHG 1.78K sh
- DYNF $67.32
- XCHG $27.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DYNF | XCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | B65 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A97Higher | B67 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DYNF and XCHG are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DYNFA
XCHGB
In short
DYNF Most factor funds make you pick a lane: value, momentum, quality. DYNF rotates across five styles instead, letting a factor model decide which one leads, and charges an index-fund-ish 0.26% to do it.
XCHG The ticker is the tell. XCHG was seeded through a Section 351 exchange, the mechanism for folding appreciated stock into a new fund, then run as an actively managed, S&P 500-benchmarked portfolio of US mid- and large-caps.
Stated mandate
DYNF The Fund seeks to outperform the U.S. equity market through diversified, tactical exposure to style factors using a factor rotation model.
XCHG The fund seeks long-term growth of capital and income by investing primarily in U.S. mid- and large-capitalization companies. Its approach combines fundamental and quantitative research and aims to outperform over market cycles.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DYNF vs XCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DYNF vs XCHG Cost
Overpaying XCHG vs DYNF
$4,621
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DYNF 0.26%
$5,358
XCHG 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DYNF | XCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $900 | $427 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $3,460 | $1,622 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $9,979 | $4,621 |
- 0.26%DYNF, cheaper
- 0.50%XCHG
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DYNF 18th cheapest of 121 funds
XCHG 45th cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF vs XCHG Dividends
- DYNF 0.84%
- XCHG
- DYNF $0.56
- XCHG
- DYNF $0.14
- XCHG $0.04
- DYNF Sep 15, 2026
- XCHG Sep 18, 2026
- DYNF Sep 18, 2026
- XCHG Sep 21, 2026
- DYNF Quarterly
- XCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
DYNF vs XCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DYNF 13.1%XCHG
- Return per unit of risk
- DYNF 1.55XCHG
- Worst fall
- DYNF −26.9%XCHG
- Market sensitivity
- DYNF 1.02XCHG 0.91
DYNF and XCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
