DYNF ranks 4th and XLSR 53rd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DYNF vs XLSR
DYNF −0.44pt a year
0.26%0.70%
DYNF 43.0×the volume
2.25M52.4K
DYNF +5.2pt
+13.8%+8.6%
DYNF vs XLSR Performance
+90.9%+51.2%
- DYNF 0.26%, better
- XLSR 0.70%
- DYNF $41.8B
- XLSR $1.09B
- DYNF +11.6%, better
- XLSR +6.3%
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DYNF 264
- XLSR 22
- DYNF 2.25M sh, better
- XLSR 52.4K sh
- DYNF $67.32
- XLSR $66.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DYNF | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | A87 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A97Higher | A88 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DYNF and XLSR are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DYNFA
XLSRC
In short
DYNF Most factor funds make you pick a lane: value, momentum, quality. DYNF rotates across five styles instead, letting a factor model decide which one leads, and charges an index-fund-ish 0.26% to do it.
XLSR Sector timing, outsourced. State Street's Investment Solutions Group tilts toward and away from the S&P 500's GICS sectors using quant signals plus human judgment, typically rebalancing monthly, all inside one US large-cap ticker.
Stated mandate
DYNF The Fund seeks to outperform the U.S. equity market through diversified, tactical exposure to style factors using a factor rotation model.
XLSR The fund seeks capital appreciation through active sector rotation. It uses quantitative and qualitative analysis to adjust sector exposures and typically rebalances monthly.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DYNF vs XLSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DYNF vs XLSR Cost
Overpaying XLSR vs DYNF
$8,248
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DYNF 0.26%
$5,358
XLSR 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DYNF | XLSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $1,250 | $777 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $4,760 | $2,922 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $13,606 | $8,248 |
- 0.26%DYNF, cheaper
- 0.70%XLSR
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DYNF 18th cheapest of 121 funds
XLSR 63rd cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF vs XLSR Dividends
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- XLSR 0.41%
- DYNF $0.56
- XLSR $0.27
- DYNF $0.14
- XLSR $0.06
- DYNF Sep 15, 2026
- XLSR Sep 25, 2026
- DYNF Sep 18, 2026
- XLSR Sep 29, 2026
- DYNF Quarterly
- XLSR Quarterly
Distribution history
DYNF vs XLSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DYNF
- XLSR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DYNF 13.1%XLSR 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DYNF 1.55, betterXLSR 1.04
- Worst fall
- DYNF −26.9%XLSR −23.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DYNF 1.02XLSR 0.97
DYNF and XLSR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

