SIXJ ranks 2nd and EALT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
EALT vs SIXJ
EALT −0.05pt a year
0.69%0.74%
EALT 1.5×the volume
22.5K15.1K
SIXJ +2.7pt
+11.8%+14.5%
EALT vs SIXJ Performance
+4.1%+10.7%
- EALT 0.69%, better
- SIXJ 0.74%
- EALT $183M
- SIXJ $146M
- EALT +4.1%
- SIXJ +10.7%, better
- EALT 4
- SIXJ 3
- EALT 22.5K sh, better
- SIXJ 15.1K sh
- EALT $35.54
- SIXJ $36.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EALT | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B68 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | D30 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | C53Higher |
| Durability | B61Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. EALT and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EALTB
SIXJB
In short
EALT Most buffer funds cushion your first dollar of loss. EALT skips that, absorbing the 5% to 15% slice of an S&P 500 ETF's decline instead, and resetting every three months. You wear the first 5%, and the upside is capped.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
EALT The fund seeks to track the return of an S&P 500 ETF, subject to a cap, while providing downside protection within the 5% to 15% loss range during each three-month outcome period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EALT vs SIXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EALT vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying SIXJ vs EALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EALT 0.69%
$13,429
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EALT | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,319 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,015 | $318 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,307 | $878 |
- 0.69%EALT, cheaper
- 0.74%SIXJ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
EALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
EALT vs SIXJ Dividends
- EALT None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
EALT vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EALT 8.8%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EALT 0.92SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- EALT −14.8%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EALT 0.67SIXJ 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.