Skip to content

EALT vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF

EALTBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.44pt a year

EALT0.69%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

EALT 13.7×the volume

EALT22.5KXTR1.64K

3Y return · a year

XTR +6.0pt

EALT+11.8%XTR+17.8%

EALT vs XTR Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+4.1%EALT+9.3%XTR

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. EALT +4.1%. XTR +9.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EALT 0.69%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
EALT $183M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
EALT +4.1%
XTR +9.3%, better
Yield (12M)
EALT No data
XTR 16.52%
Holdings
EALT 4
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
EALT 22.5K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
EALT $35.54
XTR $27.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EALT: Cost 82, Risk 30, Mission 84, Tradability 47, Holdings 50, Durability 61. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 89, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for EALT, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEALTXTR
Cost30% weightA82A100Higher
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightD30HigherD26
Tradability15% weightC47HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC50A89Higher
Durability5% weightB61HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EALT and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

EALT ranks 18th and XTR 60th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 17BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 59
  2. Rank 18BEALTInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 18BJANTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 60CPQVPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 5 ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 60CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 65DDGJAFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - JanuaryScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EALTBInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

EALT Most buffer funds cushion your first dollar of loss. EALT skips that, absorbing the 5% to 15% slice of an S&P 500 ETF's decline instead, and resetting every three months. You wear the first 5%, and the upside is capped.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

EALT The fund seeks to track the return of an S&P 500 ETF, subject to a cap, while providing downside protection within the 5% to 15% loss range during each three-month outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • EALT A 10-point protected band placed over the 5% to 15% loss zone, the ordinary-pullback range, referenced to a plain S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
  • Outcome periods run three months, so buffer and cap reset four times a year rather than once. Less waiting to get back to fresh terms.
  • 0.69% a year undercuts the typical shallow-buffer fund at 0.79%, and matches Innovator's own quarterly first-dollar sibling ZALT.
  • Live since 2023 and one of the stronger builds in a shallow-buffer field of 50-plus competing funds.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • EALT The first 5% of a decline is yours, and so is anything below 15%. This is a band of protection, not a floor.
  • Upside is capped, with a new cap set each three-month period. Buy mid-period and your buffer and cap differ from the stated terms.
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the category's heavyweights. The structure targets price outcomes, not income.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full EALT profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

EALT vs XTR Holdings

How EALT and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: EALT holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors96.2%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.97%

Sector

Sector weights in EALT and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in EALTMore in XTRGap
TechnologyEALT +2.3 points
CommunicationEALT +1.6 points
Health CareXTR +0.9 points
FinancialsXTR +1.0 points
Consumer StaplesXTR +0.6 points
EnergyXTR +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXTR +0.4 points
UtilitiesXTR +0.2 points
Real EstateXTR +0.1 points
IndustrialsSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EALT and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in EALTMore in XTRGap
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EALT100.9%
  • XTR37.2%

Securities held

  • EALT4
  • XTR505

Asset class

EALT
Stocks
XTR
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in EALT4
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in EALT

4 securities, 100% of EALT by weight

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF98.61%
  • Voo 12/31/2026 665.82 P2.15%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.09%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • Apple Inc7.78%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.03%
  • Microsoft Corp6.13%

Weight gaps

EALT and XTR share no securities.

All 6 EALT holdings⁠All 504 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EALT vs XTR Cost

Overpaying EALT vs XTR

$8,270

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EALT 0.69%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530EALT $13,429XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearEALTXTROverpaying
10$1,232$455$777
20$4,697$1,769$2,928
30$13,429$5,159$8,270

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%EALT
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

EALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

EALT vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
EALT No data
XTR 16.52%
Payout (12M)
EALT None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
EALT No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
EALT No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
EALT No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
EALT No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

EALTAll EALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

EALT vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EALT 8.8%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EALT 0.92XTR 1.19, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EALT −14.8%since Oct 2023XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EALT 0.67XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • EALTBvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EALTBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EALTBvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsSIXJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.