VB ranks 2nd and EBIT 11th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
EBIT vs VB
VB −0.26pt a year
0.29%0.03%
VB 935.6×the volume
533499K
EBIT vs VB Performance
+19.1%+15.3%
- EBIT 0.29%
- VB 0.03%, better
- EBIT $13M
- VB $176B
- EBIT +19.1%, better
- VB +15.3%
- EBIT 1.72%, better
- VB 1.26%
- EBIT 594
- VB 1305
- EBIT 533 sh
- VB 499K sh, better
- EBIT $38.92
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EBIT | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A86 |
| Risk | A74Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | F18 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | B59Higher |
| Durability | F20 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. EBIT and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EBITC
VBA
In short
EBIT Harbor skipped the licensed benchmarks and built its own small-cap index, and EBIT is the wrapper. Roughly 600 small caps, house rules, priced a shade above the plain-vanilla crowd.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
EBIT The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EBIT vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EBIT vs VB Cost
Overpaying EBIT vs VB
$5,314
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EBIT 0.29%
$5,952
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EBIT | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $55 | $472 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $216 | $1,828 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $638 | $5,314 |
- 0.29%EBIT
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
EBIT 12th cheapest of 16 funds
EBIT vs VB Dividends
- EBIT 1.72%, better
- VB 1.26%
- EBIT $0.67
- VB $3.65
- EBIT $0.67
- VB $0.85
- EBIT Dec 19, 2025
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- EBIT Dec 24, 2025
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- EBIT Irregular
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
EBIT vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EBIT 15.9%VB 16.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EBIT 0.29VB 0.89
- Worst fall
- EBIT −26.6%VB −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EBIT 0.84VB 1.07
EBIT and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



