VB ranks 2nd and IWM 6th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWM vs VB
VB −0.16pt a year
0.19%0.03%
IWM 43.9×the volume
21.9M499K
VB +0.8pt
+10.3%+11.1%
IWM vs VB Performance
+30.3%+36.2%
- IWM 0.19%
- VB 0.03%, better
- IWM $75.5B
- VB $176B
- IWM +14.6%
- VB +15.3%, better
- IWM 0.98%
- VB 1.26%, better
- IWM 1974
- VB 1305
- IWM 21.9M sh, better
- VB 499K sh
- IWM $279.44
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWM | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A86 |
| Risk | D34 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A70Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A83 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWM and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMB
VBA
In short
IWM The Russell 2000's default trading vehicle. Live since 2000, it packs the small-cap end of the US market into one heavily traded ticker with a deep options market around it. Cheaper funds track the same index; this is the liquid one.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
IWM The Fund seeks to track the Russell 2000 Index, which represents small-capitalization U.S. equities.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWM vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWM vs VB Cost
Overpaying IWM vs VB
$3,314
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWM 0.19%
$3,952
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWM | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $55 | $292 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $216 | $1,135 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $638 | $3,314 |
- 0.19%IWM
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
IWM 8th cheapest of 16 funds
IWM vs VB Dividends
- IWM 0.98%
- VB 1.26%, better
- IWM $2.73
- VB $3.65
- IWM $0.75
- VB $0.85
- IWM Sep 15, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- IWM Sep 18, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- IWM Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
IWM vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWM
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWM 19.0%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWM 0.85VB 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- IWM −31.9%VB −28.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWM 1.14VB 1.07
IWM and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





