Skip to content

VB vs VTWO

Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

VBANYSE Arca

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF

VTWOANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VB −0.03pt a year

VB0.03%VTWO0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VTWO 2.9×the volume

VB499KVTWO1.45M

10Y return · a year

VB +0.6pt

VB+11.1%VTWO+10.5%

VB vs VTWO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+36.2%VB+31.3%VTWO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. VB +36.2%. VTWO +31.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
VB 0.03%, better
VTWO 0.06%
Fund size
VB $176B
VTWO $17.3B
1Y total return
VB +15.3%, better
VTWO +14.8%
Yield (12M)
VB 1.26%, better
VTWO 1.20%
Holdings
VB 1305
VTWO 2000
Avg volume (30D)
VB 499K sh
VTWO 1.45M sh, better
NAV per share
VB $290.35
VTWO $112.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

VB: Cost 91, Risk 63, Mission 86, Tradability 57, Holdings 59, Durability 91. VTWO: Cost 75, Risk 34, Mission 100, Tradability 54, Holdings 70, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for VB, VTWO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarVBVTWO
Cost30% weightA91HigherA75
Mission25% weightA86A100Higher
Risk15% weightB63HigherD34
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB59A70Higher
Durability5% weightA91HigherA83

Rank among US Small-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. VB and VTWO are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Small-Cap⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

VB ranks 2nd and VTWO 4th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AVBVanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3ABKSEBNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4AVTWOVanguard Russell 2000 ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5ASMMDiShares Russell 2500 ETFScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

VBAVanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF

VTWOAVanguard Russell 2000 ETF

In short

VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.

VTWO The Russell 2000 is the small-cap benchmark every headline quotes. VTWO is Vanguard's cheap seat on it: about 2,000 small US companies for 0.06% a year, a fraction of the fee on the best-known fund tracking the same index.

Stated mandate

VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.

VTWO The fund invests in stocks in the Russell 2000 Index and seeks to closely track that index's return, representing small-cap U.S. stock exposure.

Why people hold it

  • VB Three basis points a year, against a small-cap category median near 0.25%. Cost is the one edge in indexing you actually keep.
  • About 1,400 stocks held at roughly their index weights, so no single small-cap story carries the fund.vanguard.com
  • Its CRSP benchmark migrates a stock between size segments in two 50% packets instead of one move, a design built to cut turnover.crsp.com
  • Running since 2004, actively traded, and one of the strongest implementations in its 20-fund small-cap peer group.
  • VTWO Same index, smaller toll. VTWO charges 0.06% while IWM, the other big Russell 2000 tracker, charges 0.19%. The small-cap category median is 0.25%.vanguard.com
  • Holds roughly 2,000 stocks, the whole small-cap benchmark rather than a trimmed slice. A multi-billion-dollar fund, actively traded, running since 2010 and paying quarterly.
  • Tracking has been about as tight as this corner of the market gets, one of the closest index-replication records among US small-cap funds.

Worth knowing

  • VB Small companies move harder in both directions than large-cap benchmarks, and this is full, unhedged exposure to that.
  • Benchmarks disagree on where small cap starts. VB follows CRSP, while IWM and VTWO track the Russell 2000, so holdings and results can drift apart.
  • US companies only, and distributions land quarterly rather than monthly.
  • VTWO Small-cap stocks swing harder than large caps, and this fund stays fully invested in them through the rough stretches.vanguard.com
  • Cheaper exists on the shelf: VB and SCHA run 0.03%, though they follow different small-cap indexes with different membership rules.
  • The Russell 2000 rebuilds its membership on a published schedule (June, plus a December rebalance from 2026), which packs index-driven trading into those dates.lseg.com

Full VB profile⁠

Full VTWO profile⁠

VB vs VTWO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

VB vs VTWO Cost

Overpaying VTWO vs VB

$632

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • VB 0.03%

    $638

  • VTWO 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • VB 0.03%
  • VTWO 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K051015202530VTWO $1,270VB $638

Year by year

YearVBVTWOOverpaying
10$55$110$55
20$216$432$216
30$638$1,270$632

Expense ratio

  • 0.03%VB, cheaper
  • 0.06%VTWO
  • Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
  • Median 0.20%

VB cheapest of 16 funds

VTWO 4th cheapest of 16 funds

VB vs VTWO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
VB 1.26%, better
VTWO 1.20%
Payout (12M)
VB $3.65
VTWO $1.36
Last payment
VB $0.85
VTWO $0.39
Ex-dividend
VB Sep 28, 2026
VTWO Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
VB Sep 30, 2026
VTWO Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
VB Quarterly
VTWO Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

VBQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll VB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.42; Jun 21, 2017 $0.26; Sep 20, 2017 $0.53; Dec 21, 2017 $0.78; Mar 22, 2018 $0.46; Jun 22, 2018 $0.38; Sep 28, 2018 $0.65; Dec 24, 2018 $0.72; Mar 28, 2019 $0.48; Jun 27, 2019 $0.48; Sep 16, 2019 $0.45; Dec 24, 2019 $0.89; Mar 10, 2020 $0.47; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 25, 2020 $0.54; Dec 24, 2020 $0.89; Mar 25, 2021 $0.56; Jun 24, 2021 $0.56; Sep 24, 2021 $0.59; Dec 27, 2021 $1.09; Mar 23, 2022 $0.56; Jun 23, 2022 $0.59; Sep 23, 2022 $0.67; Dec 15, 2022 $0.09; Dec 22, 2022 $1.01; Mar 23, 2023 $0.75; Jun 23, 2023 $0.76; Sep 21, 2023 $0.74; Dec 21, 2023 $1.08; Mar 22, 2024 $0.68; Jun 28, 2024 $0.85; Sep 27, 2024 $0.70; Dec 23, 2024 $0.90; Mar 27, 2025 $0.92; Jun 30, 2025 $0.79; Sep 29, 2025 $0.81; Dec 22, 2025 $0.93; Mar 27, 2026 $0.98; Jun 26, 2026 $0.89; Sep 28, 2026 $0.85. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VTWOQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VTWO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.09; Jun 28, 2017 $0.19; Sep 27, 2017 $0.19; Dec 14, 2017 $0.25; Mar 22, 2018 $0.09; Jun 28, 2018 $0.21; Sep 26, 2018 $0.23; Dec 13, 2018 $0.22; Mar 25, 2019 $0.09; Jun 21, 2019 $0.23; Sep 26, 2019 $0.25; Dec 16, 2019 $0.33; Mar 26, 2020 $0.06; Jun 25, 2020 $0.16; Sep 11, 2020 $0.16; Dec 17, 2020 $0.34; Mar 26, 2021 $0.15; Jun 29, 2021 $0.17; Sep 29, 2021 $0.22; Dec 16, 2021 $0.47; Mar 24, 2022 $0.12; Jun 29, 2022 $0.22; Sep 28, 2022 $0.29; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.22; Jun 23, 2023 $0.23; Sep 21, 2023 $0.32; Dec 19, 2023 $0.40; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.30; Sep 26, 2024 $0.28; Dec 23, 2024 $0.33; Mar 25, 2025 $0.25; Jun 20, 2025 $0.25; Sep 24, 2025 $0.34; Dec 22, 2025 $0.40; Mar 24, 2026 $0.26; Jun 18, 2026 $0.30; Sep 23, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

VB vs VTWO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • VB
  • VTWO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: VTWO −31.9% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
VB 16.4%, betterVTWO 19.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
VB 0.89, betterVTWO 0.86
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
VB −28.2%, betterVTWO −31.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
VB 1.07VTWO 1.14

VB and VTWO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • VBAvsSCHAA

    Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF · Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTWOAvsSCHAA

    Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF · Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VBAvsBKSEA

    Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF · BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTWOAvsBKSEA

    Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF · BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VBAvsSMMDA

    Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF · iShares Russell 2500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VTWOAvsSMMDA

    Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF · iShares Russell 2500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.