FDEM ranks 3rd and ECON 16th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
ECON vs FDEM
FDEM −0.24pt a year
0.49%0.25%
FDEM 3.5×the volume
24.7K87.5K
FDEM +3.0pt
+6.3%+9.3%
ECON vs FDEM Performance
+35.9%+55.9%
- ECON 0.49%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- ECON $294M
- FDEM $591M
- ECON +18.2%, better
- FDEM +12.2%
- ECON 1.50%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- ECON 366
- FDEM 229
- ECON 24.7K sh
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- ECON $32.72
- FDEM $33.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECON | FDEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C51 | B65Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. ECON and FDEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECOND
FDEMA
In short
ECON A 2010-vintage emerging markets ticker with a second act: once a consumer-stocks portfolio, now a broad EM index fund that screens out the names Columbia's quant models rate poorly on quality, value and catalyst.
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
Stated mandate
ECON The Fund is an index-based emerging-economies equity ETF seeking to track the performance of the Beta Advantage® Research Enhanced Solactive Emerging Economies Index.
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECON vs FDEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECON vs FDEM Cost
Overpaying ECON vs FDEM
$4,633
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECON 0.49%
$9,792
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECON | FDEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $455 | $428 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,769 | $1,625 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $5,159 | $4,633 |
- 0.49%ECON
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
ECON 14th cheapest of 20 funds
ECON vs FDEM Dividends
- ECON 1.50%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- ECON $0.48
- FDEM $1.17
- ECON $0.48
- FDEM $0.38
- ECON Dec 18, 2025
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- ECON Dec 26, 2025
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- ECON Annual
- FDEM Quarterly
Distribution history
ECON vs FDEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECON
- FDEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECON 17.5%FDEM 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECON 0.87FDEM 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- ECON −33.8%FDEM −24.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECON 1.12FDEM 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.