EMGF ranks 1st and ECON 16th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
ECON vs EMGF
EMGF −0.23pt a year
0.49%0.26%
EMGF 6.3×the volume
24.7K156K
EMGF +4.9pt
+4.0%+8.9%
ECON vs EMGF Performance
+35.9%+53.9%
- ECON 0.49%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- ECON $294M
- EMGF $1.79B
- ECON +18.2%, better
- EMGF +14.5%
- ECON 1.50%
- EMGF 2.19%, better
- ECON 366
- EMGF 740
- ECON 24.7K sh
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- ECON $32.72
- EMGF $65.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECON | EMGF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | D32 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C48 |
| Durability | C51 | A89Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. ECON and EMGF are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECOND
EMGFA
In short
ECON A 2010-vintage emerging markets ticker with a second act: once a consumer-stocks portfolio, now a broad EM index fund that screens out the names Columbia's quant models rate poorly on quality, value and catalyst.
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
Stated mandate
ECON The Fund is an index-based emerging-economies equity ETF seeking to track the performance of the Beta Advantage® Research Enhanced Solactive Emerging Economies Index.
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECON vs EMGF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECON vs EMGF Cost
Overpaying ECON vs EMGF
$4,434
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECON 0.49%
$9,792
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECON | EMGF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $473 | $410 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,838 | $1,556 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $5,358 | $4,434 |
- 0.49%ECON
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
ECON 14th cheapest of 20 funds
ECON vs EMGF Dividends
- ECON 1.50%
- EMGF 2.19%, better
- ECON $0.48
- EMGF $1.44
- ECON $0.48
- EMGF $0.61
- ECON Dec 18, 2025
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- ECON Dec 26, 2025
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- ECON Annual
- EMGF Twice a year
Distribution history
ECON vs EMGF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECON
- EMGF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECON 17.5%EMGF 16.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECON 0.87EMGF 1.09, better
- Worst fall
- ECON −33.8%EMGF −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECON 1.12EMGF 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.