Skip to content

FNDE vs PXH

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

FNDEBNYSE Arca

Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

PXHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FNDE −0.08pt a year

FNDE0.39%PXH0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

FNDE 6.9×the volume

FNDE1.53MPXH223K

10Y return · a year

FNDE +0.8pt

FNDE+9.1%PXH+8.3%

FNDE vs PXH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+58.4%FNDE+59.1%PXH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FNDE +58.4%. PXH +59.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FNDE 0.39%, better
PXH 0.47%
Fund size
FNDE $9.97B
PXH $1.94B
1Y total return
FNDE +14.4%, better
PXH +13.1%
Yield (12M)
FNDE 3.66%
PXH 4.13%, better
Holdings
FNDE 370
PXH 365
Avg volume (30D)
FNDE 1.53M sh, better
PXH 223K sh
NAV per share
FNDE $40.60
PXH $28.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FNDE: Cost 62, Risk 61, Mission 96, Tradability 74, Holdings 54, Durability 79. PXH: Cost 44, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 55, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for FNDE, PXH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFNDEPXH
Cost30% weightB62HigherC44
Mission25% weightA96Not scored
Risk15% weightB61B63Higher
Tradability15% weightA74A77Higher
Holdings10% weightC54B55Higher
Durability5% weightA79HigherA76

Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FNDE and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 10 ›

FNDE ranks 3rd and PXH 4th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AEEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2BEELVInvesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BFNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4BPXHInvesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CBLESInspire Global Hope ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FNDEBSchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

PXHBInvesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

In short

FNDE Most emerging-markets funds size a position by its market price. FNDE sizes it by the business behind it, weighting large EM companies on fundamental measures instead of market cap. Schwab has run this value-leaning version since 2013.

PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.

Stated mandate

FNDE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of large companies in emerging-market countries selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.

PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.

Why people hold it

  • FNDE Weights by fundamental size, not market cap, so a company's slot reflects its business footprint rather than what the market is currently paying for it. The value tilt is advertised, not accidental.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • At 0.39%, the fee sits under the 0.49% typical for emerging-markets ETFs. Rules-based weighting at an index-fund price.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it has hugged its RAFI index closely. Two things that often go missing in EM, where thin books and tracking slippage are common.
  • Live since 2013, with a full market cycle of history behind the method. Among the strongest implementations in a crowded emerging-markets field.
  • PXH Position sizes come from book value, cash flow, sales and dividends, not market price, so a stock rallying does not automatically earn a bigger slot in the fund.invesco.comlseg.com
  • Running since 2007, one of the longest-lived fundamental-index plays in emerging markets, now at billion-dollar scale and moderately traded.
  • Roughly 400 stocks across emerging markets, paid out quarterly. Broad coverage rather than a concentrated country or sector bet.

Worth knowing

  • FNDE Plain cap-weighted EM exposure costs less: VEXC at 0.07%, BKEM at 0.11%, XCEM at 0.16%. You are paying for the fundamental weighting.
  • Large companies only, about 400 of them, screened for liquidity. Narrower than total-market EM funds that reach into small caps.
  • A value tilt means results will separate from cap-weighted EM benchmarks in both directions. Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • PXH At 0.47% it costs a shade more than the 0.45% median index tracker, and multiples of the cheapest broad index funds (VT charges 0.06%).
  • Weighting by fundamentals means the portfolio can look very different from cap-weighted EM benchmarks, and move differently from them for long stretches.lseg.cominvesco.com
  • The benchmark switched in 2025 (it was the FTSE RAFI Emerging Index before), so the fund's long history predates today's selection rules.invesco.com

Full FNDE profile⁠

Full PXH profile⁠

FNDE vs PXH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FNDE vs PXH Cost

Overpaying PXH vs FNDE

$1,520

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FNDE 0.39%

    $7,898

  • PXH 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FNDE 0.39%
  • PXH 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PXH $9,418FNDE $7,898

Year by year

YearFNDEPXHOverpaying
10$705$847$142
20$2,725$3,261$536
30$7,898$9,418$1,520

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%FNDE, cheaper
  • 0.47%PXH
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.44%

FNDE 4th cheapest of 10 funds

PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds

FNDE vs PXH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FNDE 3.66%
PXH 4.13%, better
Payout (12M)
FNDE $1.49
PXH $1.16
Last payment
FNDE $0.19
PXH $0.32
Ex-dividend
FNDE Jun 24, 2026
PXH Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FNDE Jun 29, 2026
PXH Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FNDE Twice a year
PXH Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FNDETwice a year · 20 paymentsAll FNDE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.60; Dec 27, 2017 $0.01; Dec 12, 2018 $0.77; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.19; Dec 12, 2019 $0.85; Jun 24, 2020 $0.15; Dec 10, 2020 $0.56; Jun 23, 2021 $0.19; Dec 8, 2021 $1.13; Dec 30, 2021 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.26; Dec 7, 2022 $1.12; Jun 21, 2023 $0.27; Dec 6, 2023 $1.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $1.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.21; Dec 11, 2025 $1.30; Jun 24, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PXHQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll PXH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.01; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 18, 2017 $0.34; Dec 18, 2017 $0.15; Mar 19, 2018 $0.03; Jun 18, 2018 $0.16; Sep 24, 2018 $0.37; Dec 24, 2018 $0.09; Mar 18, 2019 $0.04; Jun 24, 2019 $0.19; Sep 23, 2019 $0.38; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.19; Sep 21, 2020 $0.27; Dec 21, 2020 $0.07; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.23; Sep 20, 2021 $0.31; Dec 20, 2021 $0.46; Mar 21, 2022 $0.05; Jun 21, 2022 $0.39; Sep 19, 2022 $0.39; Dec 19, 2022 $0.11; Mar 20, 2023 $0.13; Jun 20, 2023 $0.27; Sep 18, 2023 $0.36; Dec 18, 2023 $0.17; Mar 18, 2024 $0.06; Jun 24, 2024 $0.30; Sep 23, 2024 $0.34; Dec 23, 2024 $0.20; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.16; Sep 22, 2025 $0.38; Dec 22, 2025 $0.38; Mar 23, 2026 $0.09; Jun 22, 2026 $0.37; Sep 21, 2026 $0.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FNDE vs PXH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FNDE
  • PXH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FNDE −29.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FNDE 11.0%, betterPXH 11.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FNDE 1.49PXH 1.49Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FNDE −29.4%, betterPXH −29.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FNDE 0.80PXH 0.76

Popular comparisons

  • FNDEBvsEEMVA

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsEEMVA

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDEBvsEELVB

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsEELVB

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDEBvsBLESC

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Inspire Global Hope ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsBLESC

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · Inspire Global Hope ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.