FNDE ranks 3rd and PXH 4th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
FNDE vs PXH
FNDE −0.08pt a year
0.39%0.47%
FNDE 6.9×the volume
1.53M223K
FNDE +0.8pt
+9.1%+8.3%
FNDE vs PXH Performance
+58.4%+59.1%
- FNDE 0.39%, better
- PXH 0.47%
- FNDE $9.97B
- PXH $1.94B
- FNDE +14.4%, better
- PXH +13.1%
- FNDE 3.66%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- FNDE 370
- PXH 365
- FNDE 1.53M sh, better
- PXH 223K sh
- FNDE $40.60
- PXH $28.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDE | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B61 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A74 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | B55Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | A76 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. FNDE and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDEB
PXHB
In short
FNDE Most emerging-markets funds size a position by its market price. FNDE sizes it by the business behind it, weighting large EM companies on fundamental measures instead of market cap. Schwab has run this value-leaning version since 2013.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
FNDE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of large companies in emerging-market countries selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDE vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDE vs PXH Cost
Overpaying PXH vs FNDE
$1,520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDE 0.39%
$7,898
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDE | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $847 | $142 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,261 | $536 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,418 | $1,520 |
- 0.39%FNDE, cheaper
- 0.47%PXH
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
FNDE 4th cheapest of 10 funds
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
FNDE vs PXH Dividends
- FNDE 3.66%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- FNDE $1.49
- PXH $1.16
- FNDE $0.19
- PXH $0.32
- FNDE Jun 24, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- FNDE Jun 29, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- FNDE Twice a year
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDE vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDE
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDE 11.0%, betterPXH 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDE 1.49PXH 1.49Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- FNDE −29.4%, betterPXH −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDE 0.80PXH 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.