Skip to content

EEMV vs FNDE

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

EEMVACboe

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

FNDEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

EEMV −0.14pt a year

EEMV0.25%FNDE0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

FNDE 6.8×the volume

EEMV225KFNDE1.53M

10Y return · a year

FNDE +3.4pt

EEMV+5.7%FNDE+9.1%

EEMV vs FNDE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.7%EEMV+58.4%FNDE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. EEMV +28.7%. FNDE +58.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EEMV 0.25%, better
FNDE 0.39%
Fund size
EEMV $3.4B
FNDE $9.97B
1Y total return
EEMV +12.0%
FNDE +14.4%, better
Yield (12M)
EEMV 2.28%
FNDE 3.66%, better
Holdings
EEMV 324
FNDE 370
Avg volume (30D)
EEMV 225K sh
FNDE 1.53M sh, better
NAV per share
EEMV $71.20
FNDE $40.60
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EEMV: Cost 92, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 73, Durability 81. FNDE: Cost 62, Risk 61, Mission 96, Tradability 74, Holdings 54, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for EEMV, FNDE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEEMVFNDE
Cost30% weightA92HigherB62
Mission25% weightNot scoredA96
Risk15% weightB56B61Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherA74
Holdings10% weightA73HigherC54
Durability5% weightA81HigherA79

Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EEMV and FNDE are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 10 ›

EEMV ranks 1st and FNDE 3rd of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AEEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2BEELVInvesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BFNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4BPXHInvesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EEMVAiShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

FNDEBSchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

In short

EEMV Emerging markets with the volume turned down. Since 2011, EEMV has tracked MSCI's minimum-volatility EM index, holding roughly 300 stocks picked for steadiness rather than size, at 0.25% a year.

FNDE Most emerging-markets funds size a position by its market price. FNDE sizes it by the business behind it, weighting large EM companies on fundamental measures instead of market cap. Schwab has run this value-leaning version since 2013.

Stated mandate

EEMV The fund seeks to track an index of emerging-market equities selected for minimum-volatility characteristics.

FNDE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of large companies in emerging-market countries selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.

Why people hold it

  • EEMV At 0.25%, it carries the lowest fee in its emerging-markets factor cohort, undercutting EELV at 0.29% and ECOW at 0.70%, and sitting well below the group median.
  • Live since 2011 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund: a long public track record of running the min vol playbook in the world's bumpiest equity markets.
  • About 300 emerging-market names, chosen by published index rules rather than a manager's hunch, so what you own is auditable rather than discretionary.
  • Stands among the stronger implementations in its emerging-markets factor peer group on our review, largely on cost and issuer staying power.
  • FNDE Weights by fundamental size, not market cap, so a company's slot reflects its business footprint rather than what the market is currently paying for it. The value tilt is advertised, not accidental.schwabassetmanagement.com
  • At 0.39%, the fee sits under the 0.49% typical for emerging-markets ETFs. Rules-based weighting at an index-fund price.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it has hugged its RAFI index closely. Two things that often go missing in EM, where thin books and tracking slippage are common.
  • Live since 2013, with a full market cycle of history behind the method. Among the strongest implementations in a crowded emerging-markets field.

Worth knowing

  • EEMV Minimum volatility is a construction rule, not a floor. The index aims for smaller swings; emerging-market currency, country and political risk still ride along.
  • Screening for low volatility pulls country and sector weights away from a cap-weighted EM benchmark, so it can move to a different rhythm than the headline index.
  • Volume is moderate rather than torrential, so execution habits (limit orders, skipping the opening minutes) matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • FNDE Plain cap-weighted EM exposure costs less: VEXC at 0.07%, BKEM at 0.11%, XCEM at 0.16%. You are paying for the fundamental weighting.
  • Large companies only, about 400 of them, screened for liquidity. Narrower than total-market EM funds that reach into small caps.
  • A value tilt means results will separate from cap-weighted EM benchmarks in both directions. Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full EEMV profile⁠

Full FNDE profile⁠

EEMV vs FNDE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EEMV vs FNDE Cost

Overpaying FNDE vs EEMV

$2,739

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EEMV 0.25%

    $5,159

  • FNDE 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EEMV 0.25%
  • FNDE 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530FNDE $7,898EEMV $5,159

Year by year

YearEEMVFNDEOverpaying
10$455$705$250
20$1,769$2,725$956
30$5,159$7,898$2,739

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%EEMV, cheaper
  • 0.39%FNDE
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.44%

EEMV cheapest of 10 funds

FNDE 4th cheapest of 10 funds

EEMV vs FNDE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EEMV 2.28%
FNDE 3.66%, better
Payout (12M)
EEMV $1.62
FNDE $1.49
Last payment
EEMV $0.65
FNDE $0.19
Ex-dividend
EEMV Jun 15, 2026
FNDE Jun 24, 2026
Paid on
EEMV Jun 18, 2026
FNDE Jun 29, 2026
Frequency
EEMV Twice a year
FNDE Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EEMVTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll EEMV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.43; Dec 19, 2017 $1.00; Jun 19, 2018 $0.51; Dec 18, 2018 $0.86; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Dec 16, 2019 $0.92; Jun 15, 2020 $0.55; Dec 14, 2020 $0.94; Jun 10, 2021 $0.52; Dec 13, 2021 $0.82; Jun 9, 2022 $0.27; Dec 13, 2022 $0.76; Jun 7, 2023 $0.47; Dec 20, 2023 $1.06; Jun 11, 2024 $0.63; Dec 17, 2024 $1.40; Jun 16, 2025 $0.72; Dec 16, 2025 $0.97; Jun 15, 2026 $0.65. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
FNDETwice a year · 20 paymentsAll FNDE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.60; Dec 27, 2017 $0.01; Dec 12, 2018 $0.77; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.19; Dec 12, 2019 $0.85; Jun 24, 2020 $0.15; Dec 10, 2020 $0.56; Jun 23, 2021 $0.19; Dec 8, 2021 $1.13; Dec 30, 2021 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.26; Dec 7, 2022 $1.12; Jun 21, 2023 $0.27; Dec 6, 2023 $1.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.23; Dec 13, 2024 $1.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.21; Dec 11, 2025 $1.30; Jun 24, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

EEMV vs FNDE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • EEMV
  • FNDE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FNDE −29.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EEMV 11.6%FNDE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EEMV 0.85FNDE 1.49, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EEMV −21.9%, betterFNDE −29.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EEMV 0.72FNDE 0.80

Popular comparisons

  • EEMVAvsEELVB

    iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDEBvsEELVB

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EEMVAvsPXHB

    iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDEBvsPXHB

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EEMVAvsBLESC

    iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF · Inspire Global Hope ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNDEBvsBLESC

    Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Inspire Global Hope ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.