EEMV ranks 1st and FNDE 3rd of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
EEMV vs FNDE
EEMV −0.14pt a year
0.25%0.39%
FNDE 6.8×the volume
225K1.53M
FNDE +3.4pt
+5.7%+9.1%
EEMV vs FNDE Performance
+28.7%+58.4%
- EEMV 0.25%, better
- FNDE 0.39%
- EEMV $3.4B
- FNDE $9.97B
- EEMV +12.0%
- FNDE +14.4%, better
- EEMV 2.28%
- FNDE 3.66%, better
- EEMV 324
- FNDE 370
- EEMV 225K sh
- FNDE 1.53M sh, better
- EEMV $71.20
- FNDE $40.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EEMV | FNDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B56 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | C54 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A79 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. EEMV and FNDE are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EEMVA
FNDEB
In short
EEMV Emerging markets with the volume turned down. Since 2011, EEMV has tracked MSCI's minimum-volatility EM index, holding roughly 300 stocks picked for steadiness rather than size, at 0.25% a year.
FNDE Most emerging-markets funds size a position by its market price. FNDE sizes it by the business behind it, weighting large EM companies on fundamental measures instead of market cap. Schwab has run this value-leaning version since 2013.
Stated mandate
EEMV The fund seeks to track an index of emerging-market equities selected for minimum-volatility characteristics.
FNDE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of large companies in emerging-market countries selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EEMV vs FNDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EEMV vs FNDE Cost
Overpaying FNDE vs EEMV
$2,739
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EEMV 0.25%
$5,159
FNDE 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EEMV | FNDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $705 | $250 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $2,725 | $956 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $7,898 | $2,739 |
- 0.25%EEMV, cheaper
- 0.39%FNDE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
EEMV cheapest of 10 funds
FNDE 4th cheapest of 10 funds
EEMV vs FNDE Dividends
- EEMV 2.28%
- FNDE 3.66%, better
- EEMV $1.62
- FNDE $1.49
- EEMV $0.65
- FNDE $0.19
- EEMV Jun 15, 2026
- FNDE Jun 24, 2026
- EEMV Jun 18, 2026
- FNDE Jun 29, 2026
- EEMV Twice a year
- FNDE Twice a year
Distribution history
EEMV vs FNDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EEMV
- FNDE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EEMV 11.6%FNDE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EEMV 0.85FNDE 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- EEMV −21.9%, betterFNDE −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EEMV 0.72FNDE 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.