EMCS ranks 3rd and EEMX 6th of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EEMX vs EMCS
EMCS −0.15pt a year
0.30%0.15%
EMCS 9.1×the volume
5.85K53.1K
EMCS +0.3pt
+7.1%+7.4%
EEMX vs EMCS Performance
+41.2%+42.7%
- EEMX 0.30%
- EMCS 0.15%, better
- EEMX $163M
- EMCS $982M
- EEMX +16.0%
- EMCS +23.9%, better
- EEMX 1.98%, better
- EMCS 1.58%
- EEMX 1075
- EMCS 57
- EEMX 5.85K sh
- EMCS 53.1K sh, better
- EEMX $46.47
- EMCS $41.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EEMX | EMCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | C50Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A75Higher | A74 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EEMX and EMCS are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EEMXB
EMCSA
In short
EEMX One rule, cleanly applied: MSCI's emerging markets benchmark minus every company that owns oil, gas or coal reserves. State Street planted this flag in EM first, back in 2016, and left the other thousand-odd names alone.
EMCS A screened take on emerging markets at core-tracker pricing: 0.15% a year for roughly 70 names carved out of a global selection index. Cheap enough to sit beside the plain-vanilla EM giants, narrow enough to look nothing like them.
Stated mandate
EEMX The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy provides emerging-markets equity exposure while excluding companies that own fossil-fuel reserves.
EMCS The fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its MSCI climate-selection index. The index represents large- and mid-capitalization companies across emerging-market countries and applies ESG and climate screens.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EEMX vs EMCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EEMX vs EMCS Cost
Overpaying EEMX vs EMCS
$3,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EEMX 0.30%
$6,149
EMCS 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EEMX | EMCS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $274 | $271 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $1,071 | $1,042 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $3,137 | $3,012 |
- 0.30%EEMX
- 0.15%EMCS, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMCS cheapest of 12 funds
EEMX 6th cheapest of 12 funds
EEMX vs EMCS Dividends
- EEMX 1.98%, better
- EMCS 1.58%
- EEMX $0.96
- EMCS $0.67
- EEMX $0.12
- EMCS $0.25
- EEMX Jun 1, 2026
- EMCS Jun 18, 2026
- EEMX Jun 5, 2026
- EMCS Jun 26, 2026
- EEMX Twice a year
- EMCS Twice a year
Distribution history
EEMX vs EMCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EEMX
- EMCS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EEMX 16.7%, betterEMCS 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EEMX 1.03EMCS 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- EEMX −32.7%, betterEMCS −38.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EEMX 1.17EMCS 1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.