EFAA ranks 2nd and LQTI 5th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
EFAA vs LQTI
EFAA −0.26pt a year
0.39%0.65%
LQTI 1.3×the volume
93.6K126K
EFAA vs LQTI Performance
+11.8%−1.1%
- EFAA 0.39%, better
- LQTI 0.65%
- EFAA $673M
- LQTI $187M
- EFAA +11.8%, better
- LQTI −1.1%
- EFAA 8.49%
- LQTI 9.44%, better
- EFAA 678
- LQTI 5
- EFAA 93.6K sh
- LQTI 126K sh, better
- EFAA $54.22
- LQTI $18.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAA | LQTI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A81 |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B58 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B68 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. EFAA and LQTI are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAAA
LQTIB
In short
EFAA An MSCI EAFE index core with an option-income overlay running on only about half the portfolio, so the rest keeps its upside uncapped. The fee is 0.39% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, below the typical option-income fund.
LQTI Corporate-bond income without the corporate bonds. LQTI holds US Treasuries and runs purchased and written calls on an investment-grade bond ETF, targeting that fund's distribution rate plus 5 percentage points, paid monthly.
Stated mandate
EFAA The fund seeks total return through current income and long-term capital growth while providing MSCI EAFE exposure through an active option-income overlay intended to generate income and help mitigate downside risk.
LQTI The Fund seeks current income and secondarily capital appreciation through U.S. Treasury securities and purchased and written call options, including FLEX Options, on its investment-grade corporate bond ETF underlying.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAA vs LQTI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAA vs LQTI Cost
Overpaying LQTI vs EFAA
$4,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAA 0.39%
$7,898
LQTI 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAA | LQTI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,163 | $458 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,440 | $1,715 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,717 | $4,819 |
- 0.39%EFAA, cheaper
- 0.65%LQTI
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
EFAA 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
LQTI 5th cheapest of 25 funds
EFAA vs LQTI Dividends
- EFAA 8.49%
- LQTI 9.44%, better
- EFAA $4.62
- LQTI $1.73
- EFAA $0.38
- LQTI $0.14
- EFAA Oct 19, 2026
- LQTI Oct 1, 2026
- EFAA Oct 23, 2026
- LQTI Oct 2, 2026
- EFAA Monthly
- LQTI Monthly
Distribution history
EFAA vs LQTI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAA 8.4%LQTI 4.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAA 1.02LQTI −0.43
- Worst fall
- EFAA −12.0%LQTI −5.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAA 0.36LQTI 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.