RWM ranks 4th and EFZ 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EFZ vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 3703.3×the volume
8.11K30M
EFZ +3.1pt
−8.0%−11.1%
EFZ vs RWM Performance
−22.8%−18.3%
- EFZ 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- EFZ $10M
- RWM $163M
- EFZ −8.7%, better
- RWM −10.2%
- EFZ 3.67%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EFZ 2
- RWM 3
- EFZ 8.11K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EFZ $23.21
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | C44 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | B63Higher |
| Durability | C54 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EFZ and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFZC
RWMB
In short
EFZ Most inverse ETFs aim at the S&P or the Nasdaq. EFZ aims overseas: a straight -1x of the MSCI EAFE Index's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, running since 2007.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EFZ EFZ seeks daily investment results corresponding to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFZ vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFZ vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFZ 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EFZ
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EFZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EFZ vs RWM Dividends
- EFZ 3.67%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EFZ $0.85
- RWM $0.48
- EFZ $0.23
- RWM $0.09
- EFZ Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EFZ Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EFZ Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EFZ vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFZ
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFZ 11.8%, betterRWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFZ −1.42RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- EFZ −45.6%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFZ −0.62RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.