HBDC ranks 2nd and EHLS 27th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
EHLS vs HBDC
HBDC −2.96pt a year
3.35%0.39%
HBDC 2.5×the volume
3.2K7.84K
EHLS vs HBDC Performance
+1.7%+2.0%
- EHLS 3.35%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- EHLS $56M
- HBDC $90M
- EHLS +1.7%
- HBDC +2.0%, better
- EHLS 0.00%
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- EHLS 168
- HBDC 156
- EHLS 3.2K sh
- HBDC 7.84K sh, better
- EHLS $24.69
- HBDC $24.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EHLS | HBDC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | D25 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | C48Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | A86Higher |
| Durability | C48 | C49Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. EHLS and HBDC are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EHLSD
HBDCA
In short
EHLS A boutique long/short equity ETF that actually runs a short book: momentum names on the long side, downtrending ones on the short side, and a net equity dial set anywhere from 10% to 90%.
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
Stated mandate
EHLS The Fund is actively managed and seeks returns by simultaneously shorting a daily 2x long MSTR ETF and a daily 2x short MSTR ETF, aiming to benefit from their performance decay while keeping net MSTR exposure approximately neutral.
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EHLS vs HBDC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EHLS vs HBDC Cost
Overpaying EHLS vs HBDC
$38,910
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EHLS 3.35%
$46,808
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EHLS | HBDC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $5,360 | $705 | $4,655 |
| 20 | $18,214 | $2,725 | $15,489 |
| 30 | $46,808 | $7,898 | $38,910 |
- 3.35%EHLS
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
EHLS 26th cheapest of 29 funds
EHLS vs HBDC Dividends
- EHLS 0.00%
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- EHLS None
- HBDC $1.25
- EHLS
- HBDC $0.11
- EHLS
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- EHLS
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- EHLS
- HBDC Monthly
Distribution history
EHLS vs HBDC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EHLS 14.9%HBDC 2.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EHLS 0.39HBDC −0.28
- Worst fall
- EHLS −18.9%HBDC −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EHLS 0.83HBDC 0.13
EHLS and HBDC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 3.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.35% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.35% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
