XHS ranks 4th and EKG 19th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
EKG vs XHS
XHS −0.30pt a year
0.65%0.35%
XHS 7.3×the volume
4.35K31.9K
EKG +1.2pt
+22.7%+21.5%
EKG vs XHS Performance
+27.4%+38.0%
- EKG 0.65%
- XHS 0.35%, better
- EKG $10M
- XHS $234M
- EKG +27.4%
- XHS +38.0%, better
- EKG
- XHS 0.15%
- EKG 52
- XHS 63
- EKG 4.35K sh
- XHS 31.9K sh, better
- EKG $23.95
- XHS $144.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EKG | XHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | D34 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A87Higher |
| Durability | F22 | B64Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. EKG and XHS are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EKGD
XHSA
In short
EKG A ticker that spells out the mandate. EKG skips the pharma giants and tracks a Nasdaq index of health technology names: roughly 40 stocks building the digital plumbing of medicine, from diagnostics and devices to health data.
XHS Most health care ETFs are pharma funds in disguise. XHS buys the delivery system instead: insurers, hospitals, distributors and clinics, roughly equal weighted so one giant insurer does not run the show.
Stated mandate
EKG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Lux Health TechTM Index.
XHS The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses, providing targeted exposure to health care services companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EKG vs XHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EKG vs XHS Cost
Overpaying EKG vs XHS
$5,591
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EKG 0.65%
$12,717
XHS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EKG | XHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $634 | $529 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,454 | $1,986 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $7,126 | $5,591 |
- 0.65%EKG
- 0.35%XHS, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XHS 5th cheapest of 25 funds
EKG 18th cheapest of 25 funds
EKG vs XHS Dividends
- EKG
- XHS 0.15%
- EKG None
- XHS $0.21
- EKG
- XHS $0.01
- EKG
- XHS Sep 21, 2026
- EKG
- XHS Sep 23, 2026
- EKG
- XHS Quarterly
Distribution history
EKG vs XHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EKG 22.1%XHS 20.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EKG 0.92, betterXHS 0.85
- Worst fall
- EKG −43.8%XHS −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EKG 1.43XHS 0.93
EKG and XHS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
