FHLC ranks 2nd and EKG 19th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
EKG vs FHLC
FHLC −0.57pt a year
0.65%0.08%
FHLC 56.6×the volume
4.35K246K
EKG +6.9pt
+22.7%+15.8%
EKG vs FHLC Performance
+27.4%+28.5%
- EKG 0.65%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- EKG $10M
- FHLC $3.54B
- EKG +27.4%
- FHLC +28.5%, better
- EKG
- FHLC 1.15%
- EKG 52
- FHLC 344
- EKG 4.35K sh
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- EKG $23.95
- FHLC $88.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EKG | FHLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A81Higher |
| Risk | D34 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | C54Higher |
| Durability | F22 | A77Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. EKG and FHLC are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EKGD
FHLCA
In short
EKG A ticker that spells out the mandate. EKG skips the pharma giants and tracks a Nasdaq index of health technology names: roughly 40 stocks building the digital plumbing of medicine, from diagnostics and devices to health data.
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
EKG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Lux Health TechTM Index.
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EKG vs FHLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EKG vs FHLC Cost
Overpaying EKG vs FHLC
$10,944
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EKG 0.65%
$12,717
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EKG | FHLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $154 | $1,009 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $603 | $3,837 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $1,773 | $10,944 |
- 0.65%EKG
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
EKG 18th cheapest of 25 funds
EKG vs FHLC Dividends
- EKG
- FHLC 1.15%
- EKG None
- FHLC $1.02
- EKG
- FHLC $0.25
- EKG
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- EKG
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- EKG
- FHLC Quarterly
Distribution history
EKG vs FHLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EKG 22.1%FHLC 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EKG 0.92, betterFHLC 0.83
- Worst fall
- EKG −43.8%FHLC −17.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EKG 1.43FHLC 0.59
EKG and FHLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
