Skip to content
etf.net

EMAU vs TMAR

Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

EMAUCCboe

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March

TMARCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EMAU −0.65pt a year

EMAU0.30%TMAR0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

TMAR 20.9×the volume

EMAU313TMAR6.54K

EMAU vs TMAR Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−6.0%EMAU−5.6%TMAR

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. EMAU −6.0%. TMAR −5.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
EMAU 0.30%, better
TMAR 0.95%
Fund size
EMAU $1M
TMAR $16M
1Y total return
EMAU No data
TMAR +12.4%
Holdings
EMAU 4
TMAR 3
Avg volume (30D)
EMAU 313 sh
TMAR 6.54K sh, better
NAV per share
EMAU $24.10
TMAR $25.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMAU: Cost 90, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 7, Holdings not scored, Durability 5. TMAR: Cost 17, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMAU, TMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMAUTMAR
Cost30% weightA90HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36B66Higher
Tradability15% weightF7B67Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF5B68Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMAU and TMAR are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

TMAR ranks 7th and EMAU 9th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 6CTDECFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  2. Rank 7CTMARFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - MarchScore 43
  3. Rank 8CBUFEFT Vest Laddered Emerging Markets Buffer ETFScore 42
  4. Rank 9CEMAUCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 9CEMJLCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

EMAU vs TMAR Holdings

How EMAU and TMAR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EMAU and 0.0% of TMAR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for TMAR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMAU and TMAR, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMAUMore in TMAR
TaiwanSame weight
South KoreaSame weight
ChinaSame weight
IndiaSame weight
BrazilSame weight
South AfricaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
PolandSame weight
Other countries (10)Same weight

Outside the US: EMAU 1% developed, 99% emerging. TMAR 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMAU105.1%
  • TMAR102.8%

Securities held

  • EMAU3
  • TMAR2

Asset class

EMAU
Equity
TMAR
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in EMAU3
  • In both0
  • Only in TMAR2

Only in EMAU

3 securities, 100% of EMAU by weight

  • Eem 07/30/2027 12.86 C76.88%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202715.31%
  • Eem 07/30/2027 64.32 P10.46%

Only in TMAR

2 securities, 100% of TMAR by weight

  • 2027-03-19 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.5699.03%
  • 2027-03-19 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 55.643.03%

Weight gaps

EMAU and TMAR share no securities.

All EMAU holdings⁠All 4 TMAR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMAU vs TMAR Cost

Overpaying TMAR vs EMAU

$11,720

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMAU 0.30%

    $6,149

  • TMAR 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMAU 0.30%
  • TMAR 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TMAR $17,869EMAU $6,149

Year by year

YearEMAUTMAROverpaying
10$545$1,678$1,133
20$2,113$6,322$4,209
30$6,149$17,869$11,720

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%EMAU, cheaper
  • 0.95%TMAR
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EMAU cheapest of 14 funds

TMAR 10th cheapest of 14 funds

EMAU vs TMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
EMAU None
TMAR None

Distribution history

EMAUAll EMAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TMARAll TMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EMAU vs TMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMAU No dataTMAR 9.5%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMAU No dataTMAR 1.31since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMAU No dataTMAR −9.9%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMAU 0.00TMAR 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • EMAUCvsEBUFB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMARCvsEBUFB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEJANB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMARCvsEJANB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEOCTB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TMARCvsEOCTB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.