EBUF ranks 1st and TMAR 7th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EBUF vs TMAR
EBUF −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
EBUF 2.7×the volume
17.6K6.54K
EBUF vs TMAR Performance
+7.7%+12.4%
- EBUF 0.89%, better
- TMAR 0.95%
- EBUF $46M
- TMAR $16M
- EBUF +7.7%
- TMAR +12.4%, better
- EBUF 3
- TMAR 3
- EBUF 17.6K sh, better
- TMAR 6.54K sh
- EBUF $30.58
- TMAR $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EBUF | TMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | B68 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EBUF and TMAR are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EBUFB
TMARC
In short
EBUF Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EBUF points the same machinery at emerging markets: MSCI EM exposure in roughly three-month stretches, with a 10% downside buffer and an upside cap reset at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
EBUF The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over each approximately three-month period, subject to a maximum upside return and a 10% downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EBUF vs TMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EBUF vs TMAR Cost
Overpaying TMAR vs EBUF
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EBUF 0.89%
$16,872
TMAR 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EBUF | TMAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%EBUF, cheaper
- 0.95%TMAR
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EBUF 5th cheapest of 14 funds
TMAR 10th cheapest of 14 funds
EBUF vs TMAR Dividends
- EBUF None
- TMAR None
Distribution history
EBUF vs TMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EBUF 5.5%TMAR 9.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EBUF 0.85TMAR 1.31
- Worst fall
- EBUF −6.5%TMAR −9.9%
- Market sensitivity
- EBUF 0.21TMAR 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.