Skip to content

EJAN vs TMAR

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

EJANBNYSE Arca

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March

TMARCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

EJAN −0.06pt a year

EJAN0.89%TMAR0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

EJAN 2.0×the volume

EJAN13.2KTMAR6.54K

EJAN vs TMAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.8%EJAN+12.4%TMAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EJAN +8.8%. TMAR +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EJAN 0.89%, better
TMAR 0.95%
Fund size
EJAN $141M
TMAR $16M
1Y total return
EJAN +8.8%
TMAR +12.4%, better
Holdings
EJAN 3
TMAR 3
Avg volume (30D)
EJAN 13.2K sh, better
TMAR 6.54K sh
NAV per share
EJAN $36.28
TMAR $25.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EJAN: Cost 47, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. TMAR: Cost 17, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for EJAN, TMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEJANTMAR
Cost30% weightC47HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA84HigherB67
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA87HigherB68

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EJAN and TMAR are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EJAN ranks 2nd and TMAR 7th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BEBUFInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 2BEJANInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 61
  3. Rank 2BEOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 6CTDECFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  5. Rank 7CTMARFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - MarchScore 43
  6. Rank 8CBUFEFT Vest Laddered Emerging Markets Buffer ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EJANBInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

TMARCFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March

In short

EJAN Buffer ETFs almost all point at the S&P 500. EJAN aims the same machinery at emerging markets: EEM exposure with the first 15% of losses absorbed over a 12-month outcome period that restarts every January, in exchange for a cap reset each year.

TMAR No data

Stated mandate

EJAN The fund seeks to track the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), subject to a predetermined upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the outcome period.

TMAR No data

Why people hold it

  • EJAN The buffer trade pointed at one of the bumpiest corners of equities: EEM upside to a cap, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed by the options.innovatoretfs.com
  • Live since 2020 and through multiple annual resets, including down years for foreign stocks. The mechanism has real mileage, not just a back-test.globenewswire.com
  • A 1940 Act fund holding listed options, not a bank-issued note, so the defined outcome doesn't hang on one issuer's credit.innovatoretfs.com
  • January isn't the only door in. Innovator runs EM buffer siblings EJUL and EBUF, so the reset date can be laddered instead of concentrated on one calendar day.

TMAR No data

Worth knowing

  • EJAN The options reference EEM's price, not total return, so emerging-market dividends sit outside the deal and the fund has no regular distribution schedule.innovatoretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are built for the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your own downside cushion and remaining upside depend on where EEM has traveled since the reset.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.89% a year, matching the buffer-fund median but far above a plain EM index fund. Volume also runs light next to the big US-equity buffer names, so spreads can widen.

TMAR No data

Full EJAN profile⁠

Full TMAR profile⁠

EJAN vs TMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EJAN vs TMAR Cost

Overpaying TMAR vs EJAN

$997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EJAN 0.89%

    $16,872

  • TMAR 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EJAN 0.89%
  • TMAR 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TMAR $17,869EJAN $16,872

Year by year

YearEJANTMAROverpaying
10$1,576$1,678$102
20$5,953$6,322$369
30$16,872$17,869$997

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%EJAN, cheaper
  • 0.95%TMAR
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EJAN 5th cheapest of 14 funds

TMAR 10th cheapest of 14 funds

EJAN vs TMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
EJAN None
TMAR None

Distribution history

EJANAll EJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TMARAll TMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EJAN vs TMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EJAN 6.9%TMAR 9.5%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EJAN 0.85TMAR 1.31since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EJAN −19.7%TMAR −9.9%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EJAN 0.41TMAR 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • EJANBvsEBUFB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMARCvsEBUFB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EJANBvsEOCTB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMARCvsEOCTB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EJANBvsEJULB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMARCvsEJULB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.