EMCS ranks 3rd and EMSF 12th of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EMCS vs EMSF
EMCS −0.64pt a year
0.15%0.79%
EMCS 15.5×the volume
53.1K3.42K
EMCS +11.9pt
+25.2%+13.3%
EMCS vs EMSF Performance
+23.9%+14.3%
- EMCS 0.15%, better
- EMSF 0.79%
- EMCS $982M
- EMSF $38M
- EMCS +23.9%, better
- EMSF +14.3%
- EMCS 1.58%, better
- EMSF 1.55%
- EMCS 57
- EMSF 64
- EMCS 53.1K sh, better
- EMSF 3.42K sh
- EMCS $41.19
- EMSF $33.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMCS | EMSF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | D37 | C44Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | F9 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EMCS and EMSF are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMCSA
EMSFF
In short
EMCS A screened take on emerging markets at core-tracker pricing: 0.15% a year for roughly 70 names carved out of a global selection index. Cheap enough to sit beside the plain-vanilla EM giants, narrow enough to look nothing like them.
EMSF Matthews made its name picking stocks in Asia and emerging markets. EMSF points that research at EM companies meeting its own ESG standards: fully active, measured against the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rather than bound to it.
Stated mandate
EMCS The fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its MSCI climate-selection index. The index represents large- and mid-capitalization companies across emerging-market countries and applies ESG and climate screens.
EMSF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in emerging-market common and preferred stocks that meet one or more of its ESG standards.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMCS vs EMSF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMCS vs EMSF Cost
Overpaying EMSF vs EMCS
$12,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMCS 0.15%
$3,137
EMSF 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMCS | EMSF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,405 | $1,131 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $5,331 | $4,260 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $15,174 | $12,037 |
- 0.15%EMCS, cheaper
- 0.79%EMSF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMCS cheapest of 12 funds
EMSF 11th cheapest of 12 funds
EMCS vs EMSF Dividends
- EMCS 1.58%, better
- EMSF 1.55%
- EMCS $0.67
- EMSF $0.53
- EMCS $0.25
- EMSF $0.53
- EMCS Jun 18, 2026
- EMSF Dec 17, 2025
- EMCS Jun 26, 2026
- EMSF Dec 22, 2025
- EMCS Twice a year
- EMSF Annual
Distribution history
EMCS vs EMSF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMCS 17.2%, betterEMSF 23.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMCS 1.21, betterEMSF 0.53
- Worst fall
- EMCS −38.1%EMSF −25.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EMCS 1.18EMSF 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.