EMCS ranks 3rd and FRDM 9th of 12 funds in the Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index Category.
EMCS vs FRDM
EMCS −0.34pt a year
0.15%0.49%
FRDM 5.5×the volume
53.1K292K
FRDM +8.3pt
+7.4%+15.7%
EMCS vs FRDM Performance
+42.7%+107.4%
- EMCS 0.15%, better
- FRDM 0.49%
- EMCS $982M
- FRDM $3.11B
- EMCS +23.9%
- FRDM +32.8%, better
- EMCS 1.58%
- FRDM 1.91%, better
- EMCS 57
- FRDM 135
- EMCS 53.1K sh
- FRDM 292K sh, better
- EMCS $41.19
- FRDM $60.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMCS | FRDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B56 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D37Higher | D33 |
| Durability | A74Higher | B69 |
Rank among Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. EMCS and FRDM are both graded against the same 12 Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMCSA
FRDMC
In short
EMCS A screened take on emerging markets at core-tracker pricing: 0.15% a year for roughly 70 names carved out of a global selection index. Cheap enough to sit beside the plain-vanilla EM giants, narrow enough to look nothing like them.
FRDM Most emerging-markets funds buy the whole market and move on. FRDM tracks the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index instead: a passive, rules-based screen that lands on roughly 100 stocks.
Stated mandate
EMCS The fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its MSCI climate-selection index. The index represents large- and mid-capitalization companies across emerging-market countries and applies ESG and climate screens.
FRDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index using a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMCS vs FRDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMCS vs FRDM Cost
Overpaying FRDM vs EMCS
$6,655
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMCS 0.15%
$3,137
FRDM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMCS | FRDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $883 | $609 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,394 | $2,323 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $9,792 | $6,655 |
- 0.15%EMCS, cheaper
- 0.49%FRDM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.33%
EMCS cheapest of 12 funds
FRDM 9th cheapest of 12 funds
EMCS vs FRDM Dividends
- EMCS 1.58%
- FRDM 1.91%, better
- EMCS $0.67
- FRDM $1.18
- EMCS $0.25
- FRDM $0.29
- EMCS Jun 18, 2026
- FRDM Sep 28, 2026
- EMCS Jun 26, 2026
- FRDM Sep 30, 2026
- EMCS Twice a year
- FRDM Quarterly
Distribution history
EMCS vs FRDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMCS
- FRDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMCS 17.2%, betterFRDM 22.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMCS 1.21, betterFRDM 1.19
- Worst fall
- EMCS −38.1%FRDM −29.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMCS 1.18FRDM 1.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.