EMLC ranks 1st and FEMB 5th of 7 funds in the Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) Category.
EMLC vs FEMB
EMLC −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
EMLC 22.6×the volume
2.12M93.6K
FEMB +0.6pt
+1.2%+1.8%
EMLC vs FEMB Performance
+12.6%+18.0%
- EMLC 0.30%, better
- FEMB 0.85%
- EMLC $4.89B
- FEMB $372M
- EMLC +2.6%, better
- FEMB +2.2%
- EMLC 6.50%
- FEMB 7.04%, better
- EMLC 531
- FEMB 63
- EMLC 2.12M sh, better
- FEMB 93.6K sh
- EMLC $24.59
- FEMB $27.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMLC | FEMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A81 |
| Risk | C41Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds
Same Category. EMLC and FEMB are both graded against the same 7 Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMLCA
FEMBC
In short
EMLC Emerging-market governments borrowing in their own money, not dollars. EMLC has run that trade since 2010, holding roughly 500 local-currency sovereign bonds and paying monthly. You own the yields and the currencies, unhedged.
FEMB Emerging-market debt bought in the borrower's own money, not dollars, and picked by a manager rather than an index. At least 80% of assets sit in local-currency bonds, so the currency move counts alongside the coupon. Pays monthly.
Stated mandate
EMLC The fund seeks to track the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global Core Index, which represents local-currency bonds issued by emerging-market governments.
FEMB The Fund seeks maximum total return and current income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMLC vs FEMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMLC vs FEMB Cost
Overpaying FEMB vs EMLC
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMLC 0.30%
$6,149
FEMB 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMLC | FEMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%EMLC, cheaper
- 0.85%FEMB
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds
- Median 0.55%
EMLC cheapest of 7 funds
FEMB 7th cheapest of 7 funds
EMLC vs FEMB Dividends
- EMLC 6.50%
- FEMB 7.04%, better
- EMLC $1.60
- FEMB $1.97
- EMLC $0.14
- FEMB $0.20
- EMLC Oct 1, 2026
- FEMB Oct 21, 2026
- EMLC Oct 6, 2026
- FEMB Oct 30, 2026
- EMLC Monthly
- FEMB Monthly
Distribution history
EMLC vs FEMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMLC
- FEMB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMLC 7.8%, betterFEMB 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMLC 0.42, betterFEMB 0.41
- Worst fall
- EMLC −20.5%, betterFEMB −21.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EMLC 1.11FEMB 1.27
EMLC and FEMB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




