SPHQ ranks 4th and EMOT 24th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
EMOT vs SPHQ
SPHQ −0.45pt a year
0.60%0.15%
SPHQ 1910.6×the volume
7081.35M
EMOT vs SPHQ Performance
+12.9%+13.2%
- EMOT 0.60%
- SPHQ 0.15%, better
- EMOT $3M
- SPHQ $18.5B
- EMOT +12.9%
- SPHQ +13.2%, better
- EMOT 1.04%
- SPHQ 1.05%, better
- EMOT 51
- SPHQ 102
- EMOT 708 sh
- SPHQ 1.35M sh, better
- EMOT $26.68
- SPHQ $82.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMOT | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | A84Higher |
| Mission | C40 | B69Higher |
| Risk | C53 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | F12 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D38 |
| Durability | D26 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. EMOT and SPHQ are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMOTD
SPHQA
In short
EMOT Moat investing, done S&P's way: EMOT narrows the S&P 500 to roughly 50 companies flagged for durable competitive advantage and holds them outright. A 2024 First Trust launch with a concentrated quality tilt.
SPHQ Live since 2005, SPHQ is an elder statesman of quality investing: rank the S&P 500 on profitability, earnings quality and balance-sheet strength, hold the top 100, charge 0.15% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
Stated mandate
EMOT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P 500 Economic Moat Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in index securities and generally uses full replication.
SPHQ The fund seeks exposure to the S&P 500 Quality Index and normally invests at least 90% of assets in common stocks included in that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMOT vs SPHQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMOT vs SPHQ Cost
Overpaying EMOT vs SPHQ
$8,680
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMOT 0.60%
$11,817
SPHQ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMOT | SPHQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $274 | $802 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $1,071 | $3,045 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $3,137 | $8,680 |
- 0.60%EMOT
- 0.15%SPHQ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
SPHQ 3rd cheapest of 26 funds
EMOT 25th cheapest of 26 funds
EMOT vs SPHQ Dividends
- EMOT 1.04%
- SPHQ 1.05%, better
- EMOT $0.28
- SPHQ $0.87
- EMOT $0.04
- SPHQ $0.15
- EMOT Sep 24, 2026
- SPHQ Sep 21, 2026
- EMOT Sep 30, 2026
- SPHQ Sep 25, 2026
- EMOT Quarterly
- SPHQ Quarterly
Distribution history
EMOT vs SPHQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMOT 11.7%SPHQ 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMOT 0.85SPHQ 1.23
- Worst fall
- EMOT −16.4%SPHQ −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EMOT 0.82SPHQ 0.81
EMOT and SPHQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

