Skip to content

ENDW vs GHTA

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

GHTADCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −1.55pt a year

ENDW0.22%GHTA1.77%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 2.8×the volume

ENDW17.1KGHTA6.19K

ENDW vs GHTA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+1.2%GHTA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. GHTA +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
GHTA 1.77%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
GHTA $30M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
GHTA +1.2%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
GHTA 3.86%, better
Holdings
ENDW 73
GHTA 26
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
GHTA 6.19K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
GHTA $29.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. GHTA: Cost 3, Risk 43, Mission 57, Tradability 63, Holdings 45, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, GHTA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWGHTA
Cost30% weightA100HigherF3
Mission25% weightA81HigherB57
Risk15% weightA75HigherC43
Tradability15% weightB69HigherB63
Holdings10% weightB62HigherC45
Durability5% weightB65HigherC50

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and GHTA are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and GHTA 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 37CTOAOTwin Oak Active Opportunities III ETFScore 39
  4. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

GHTADGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

GHTA A boutique macro shop's one-ticker answer to 60/40: GHTA actively shuffles global stock and bond ETFs as the business cycle turns, and measures itself against a plain 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

GHTA The Fund seeks total return. It uses an actively managed tactical, go-anywhere approach across a wide variety of asset classes, including individual equities and ETFs, with exposure determined by market capitalization and/or industry classification.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • GHTA Go-anywhere by design. One ticker buys an actively managed mix across asset classes and geographies instead of a fixed stock-bond split.gham.co
  • Honest yardstick: the fund names a 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend as its reference, so the manager's calls are judged against a simple mix anyone can replicate.
  • Built on ETFs, not a black box. The portfolio holds equity and fixed income funds, and the adviser runs a macro and business-cycle framework it has applied since the 2021 launch.gham.cogham.co 2

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • GHTA Cost is the sticking point: 1.77% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027 (1.84% gross), above the median of its 46-fund tactical group. ENDW charges 0.22%; GMOD 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than on household-name allocation funds, and size moves with flows.
  • Everything rides on the manager's timing, not an index rulebook, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.gham.co

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full GHTA profile⁠

ENDW vs GHTA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs GHTA Cost

Overpaying GHTA vs ENDW

$25,413

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • GHTA 1.77%

    $29,971

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • GHTA 1.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530GHTA $29,971ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWGHTAOverpaying
10$401$3,022$2,621
20$1,561$10,977$9,416
30$4,558$29,971$25,413

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.77%GHTA
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

GHTA 44th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs GHTA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
GHTA 3.86%, better
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
GHTA $1.15
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
GHTA $1.15
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
GHTA Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
GHTA Dec 17, 2025
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
GHTA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
GHTAAnnual · 8 paymentsAll GHTA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.04; Dec 27, 2022 $0.06; Dec 19, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2023 $0.01; Dec 17, 2024 $0.66; Dec 27, 2024 $0.03; Dec 16, 2025 $1.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

ENDW vs GHTA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025GHTA 10.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025GHTA 0.53
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025GHTA −13.9%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61GHTA 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsGMODA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsPTBDA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsRISNA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.