Skip to content

GHTA vs PTBD

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

GHTADCboe

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −1.17pt a year

GHTA1.77%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 3.0×the volume

GHTA6.19KPTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

GHTA +4.8pt

GHTA+9.7%PTBD+4.9%

GHTA vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.2%GHTA−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GHTA +1.2%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%4%6%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GHTA 1.77%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
GHTA $30M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
GHTA +1.2%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
GHTA 3.86%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
GHTA 26
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
GHTA 6.19K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
GHTA $29.92
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GHTA: Cost 3, Risk 43, Mission 57, Tradability 63, Holdings 45, Durability 50. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for GHTA, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGHTAPTBD
Cost30% weightF3A83Higher
Mission25% weightB57Not scored
Risk15% weightC43B60Higher
Tradability15% weightB63HigherC50
Holdings10% weightC45A90Higher
Durability5% weightC50A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GHTA and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and GHTA 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 37CTOAOTwin Oak Active Opportunities III ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GHTADGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

GHTA A boutique macro shop's one-ticker answer to 60/40: GHTA actively shuffles global stock and bond ETFs as the business cycle turns, and measures itself against a plain 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

GHTA The Fund seeks total return. It uses an actively managed tactical, go-anywhere approach across a wide variety of asset classes, including individual equities and ETFs, with exposure determined by market capitalization and/or industry classification.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • GHTA Go-anywhere by design. One ticker buys an actively managed mix across asset classes and geographies instead of a fixed stock-bond split.gham.co
  • Honest yardstick: the fund names a 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend as its reference, so the manager's calls are judged against a simple mix anyone can replicate.
  • Built on ETFs, not a black box. The portfolio holds equity and fixed income funds, and the adviser runs a macro and business-cycle framework it has applied since the 2021 launch.gham.cogham.co 2
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • GHTA Cost is the sticking point: 1.77% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027 (1.84% gross), above the median of its 46-fund tactical group. ENDW charges 0.22%; GMOD 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than on household-name allocation funds, and size moves with flows.
  • Everything rides on the manager's timing, not an index rulebook, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.gham.co
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full GHTA profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

GHTA vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GHTA vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying GHTA vs PTBD

$18,154

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GHTA 1.77%

    $29,971

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GHTA 1.77%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530GHTA $29,971PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearGHTAPTBDOverpaying
10$3,022$1,076$1,946
20$10,977$4,116$6,861
30$29,971$11,817$18,154

Expense ratio

  • 1.77%GHTA
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

GHTA 44th cheapest of 46 funds

GHTA vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GHTA 3.86%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
GHTA $1.15
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
GHTA $1.15
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
GHTA Dec 16, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
GHTA Dec 17, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
GHTA Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GHTAAnnual · 5 paymentsAll GHTA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2023 $0.01; Dec 17, 2024 $0.66; Dec 27, 2024 $0.03; Dec 16, 2025 $1.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

GHTA vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GHTA 10.0%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GHTA 0.53, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GHTA −13.9%since Nov 2021PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GHTA 0.86PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • GHTADvsENDWA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsGMODA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsRISNA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.