PTBD ranks 3rd and GHTA 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GHTA vs PTBD
PTBD −1.17pt a year
1.77%0.60%
PTBD 3.0×the volume
6.19K18.6K
GHTA +4.8pt
+9.7%+4.9%
GHTA vs PTBD Performance
+1.2%−0.1%
- GHTA 1.77%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- GHTA $30M
- PTBD $83M
- GHTA +1.2%, better
- PTBD −0.1%
- GHTA 3.86%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- GHTA 26
- PTBD 1047
- GHTA 6.19K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- GHTA $29.92
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GHTA | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A83Higher |
| Mission | B57 | |
| Risk | C43 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | C45 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GHTA and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GHTAD
PTBDA
In short
GHTA A boutique macro shop's one-ticker answer to 60/40: GHTA actively shuffles global stock and bond ETFs as the business cycle turns, and measures itself against a plain 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
GHTA The Fund seeks total return. It uses an actively managed tactical, go-anywhere approach across a wide variety of asset classes, including individual equities and ETFs, with exposure determined by market capitalization and/or industry classification.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GHTA vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GHTA vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying GHTA vs PTBD
$18,154
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GHTA 1.77%
$29,971
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GHTA | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,022 | $1,076 | $1,946 |
| 20 | $10,977 | $4,116 | $6,861 |
| 30 | $29,971 | $11,817 | $18,154 |
- 1.77%GHTA
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
GHTA 44th cheapest of 46 funds
GHTA vs PTBD Dividends
- GHTA 3.86%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- GHTA $1.15
- PTBD $1.17
- GHTA $1.15
- PTBD $0.10
- GHTA Dec 16, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- GHTA Dec 17, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- GHTA Annual
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
GHTA vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GHTA 10.0%PTBD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GHTA 0.53, betterPTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- GHTA −13.9%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GHTA 0.86PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.77% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.77% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.