Skip to content

ENDW vs PRTO

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF

PRTOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.60pt a year

ENDW0.22%PRTO0.82%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 19.8×the volume

ENDW17.1KPRTO864

ENDW vs PRTO Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%ENDW−0.7%PRTO

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +0.9%. PRTO −0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
PRTO 0.82%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
PRTO $18M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%
PRTO No data
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
PRTO No data
Holdings
ENDW 73
PRTO 19
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
PRTO 864 sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
PRTO $27.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. PRTO: Cost 66, Risk 57, Mission 59, Tradability 40, Holdings 59, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, PRTO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWPRTO
Cost30% weightA100HigherB66
Mission25% weightA81HigherB59
Risk15% weightA75HigherB57
Tradability15% weightB69HigherC40
Holdings10% weightB62HigherB59
Durability5% weightB65HigherF21

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and PRTO are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and PRTO 21st of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 21BGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 21BPRTORCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 21BUSAFAtlas America FundScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

PRTOBRCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

PRTO A rules-driven wanderer: PRTO leans on trend and momentum signals to shift across asset classes instead of parking in a fixed 60/40. Launched in 2026 at 0.82% a year, it undercuts the typical tactical allocator while it builds a record.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

PRTO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through dynamic allocation across multiple asset classes, using systematic trend-following and momentum-driven signals.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • PRTO The mandate is explicit: dynamic allocation across multiple asset classes driven by systematic trend-following and momentum signals. Rules decide when it leans in or backs off, not a manager's mood.
  • 0.82% a year sits below the median fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, where all that shape-shifting usually costs more.
  • One ticker covers the allocation decision. Instead of you rebalancing sleeves, the signals dial exposures up and down across asset classes.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • PRTO It launched in 2026, so the signals have no long track record across a full market cycle yet.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than the category's heavyweights, and size orders can move the price.
  • Below the peer median on fees, not at the floor. ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run tactical allocation playbooks for less.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full PRTO profile⁠

ENDW vs PRTO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs PRTO Cost

Overpaying PRTO vs ENDW

$11,131

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • PRTO 0.82%

    $15,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • PRTO 0.82%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PRTO $15,689ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWPRTOOverpaying
10$401$1,457$1,056
20$1,561$5,519$3,958
30$4,558$15,689$11,131

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.82%PRTO
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

PRTO 16th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs PRTO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
PRTO No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
PRTO None
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
PRTO No data
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
PRTO No data
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
PRTO No data
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
PRTO No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
PRTOAll PRTO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ENDW vs PRTO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025PRTO No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025PRTO No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025PRTO No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61PRTO 0.79

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRTOBvsGMODA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRTOBvsPTBDA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PRTOBvsRISNA

    RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.82% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.