PTBD ranks 3rd and PRTO 21st of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PRTO vs PTBD
PTBD −0.22pt a year
0.82%0.60%
PTBD 21.5×the volume
86418.6K
PRTO vs PTBD Performance
−0.7%−1.6%
- PRTO 0.82%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- PRTO $18M
- PTBD $83M
- PRTO
- PTBD −0.1%
- PRTO
- PTBD 6.36%
- PRTO 19
- PTBD 1047
- PRTO 864 sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- PRTO $27.49
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PRTO | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A83Higher |
| Mission | B59 | |
| Risk | B57 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A90Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PRTO and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PRTOB
PTBDA
In short
PRTO A rules-driven wanderer: PRTO leans on trend and momentum signals to shift across asset classes instead of parking in a fixed 60/40. Launched in 2026 at 0.82% a year, it undercuts the typical tactical allocator while it builds a record.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
PRTO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through dynamic allocation across multiple asset classes, using systematic trend-following and momentum-driven signals.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PRTO vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PRTO vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying PRTO vs PTBD
$3,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PRTO 0.82%
$15,689
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PRTO | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,457 | $1,076 | $381 |
| 20 | $5,519 | $4,116 | $1,403 |
| 30 | $15,689 | $11,817 | $3,872 |
- 0.82%PRTO
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
PRTO 16th cheapest of 46 funds
PRTO vs PTBD Dividends
- PRTO
- PTBD 6.36%
- PRTO None
- PTBD $1.17
- PRTO
- PTBD $0.10
- PRTO
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- PRTO
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- PRTO
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
PRTO vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PRTO PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- PRTO PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- PRTO PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PRTO 0.79PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.82% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.82% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.