Skip to content

ENDW vs PWS

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Pacer WealthShield ETF

PWSBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.38pt a year

ENDW0.22%PWS0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 2.8×the volume

ENDW17.1KPWS6.13K

ENDW vs PWS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW−3.7%PWS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. PWS −3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
PWS 0.60%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
PWS $14M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
PWS −3.7%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
PWS 2.14%
Holdings
ENDW 73
PWS 315
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
PWS 6.13K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
PWS $31.81
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. PWS: Cost 83, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 77, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, PWS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWPWS
Cost30% weightA100HigherA83
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherD39
Tradability15% weightB69HigherB64
Holdings10% weightB62A77Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherB56

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and PWS are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and PWS 6th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 6BPWSPacer WealthShield ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 7BLEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

PWSBPacer WealthShield ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

PWS A tactical fund that takes its cue from the junk-bond market. When high-yield credit and sector momentum turn, PWS rotates between U.S. equity sectors and Treasuries, then re-checks the tape every month.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

PWS The Fund uses a rules-based trend-following strategy to shift exposure between U.S. equity sectors and U.S. Treasury securities. Its monthly evaluations consider high-yield credit conditions, Treasury rates, and momentum in equity sectors and long-term Treasuries.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • PWS Rules run it, not hunches: monthly signals from high-yield credit, Treasury rates and sector momentum decide the mix. It has tracked its own index tightly.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, under the median for tactical multi-asset funds, which is unusual for a strategy that rotates whole asset classes on a schedule.
  • Live since 2017, so the record spans real drawdowns, not just a backtest. It pays quarterly and holds roughly 300 stocks when the equity side is on.
  • Rated among the stronger implementations in its tactical peer group on ETF.net's review.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • PWS Small and thinly traded. Spreads can be wide and orders can move the price, so the trading experience differs from a mega-cap index fund.
  • Trend rules can whipsaw. In choppy markets the fund may step out after a drop and step back in after a bounce, paying for the round trip.
  • Cheaper tactical options exist: ENDW runs 0.22% and ONOF 0.39%, though neither uses the same credit-plus-momentum switch.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full PWS profile⁠

ENDW vs PWS Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs PWS Cost

Overpaying PWS vs ENDW

$7,259

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • PWS 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • PWS 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PWS $11,817ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWPWSOverpaying
10$401$1,076$675
20$1,561$4,116$2,555
30$4,558$11,817$7,259

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.60%PWS
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

PWS 8th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs PWS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
PWS 2.14%
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
PWS $0.68
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
PWS $0.34
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
PWS Sep 3, 2026
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
PWS Sep 8, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
PWS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
PWSQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll PWS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2018 $0.05; Jun 26, 2018 $0.05; Sep 25, 2018 $0.11; Dec 24, 2018 $0.07; Mar 26, 2019 $0.14; Jun 25, 2019 $0.07; Sep 24, 2019 $0.08; Dec 24, 2019 $0.13; Mar 23, 2020 $0.05; Jun 22, 2020 $0.03; Sep 21, 2020 $0.05; Dec 21, 2020 $0.02; Mar 22, 2021 $0.05; Jun 21, 2021 $0.09; Sep 23, 2021 $0.12; Dec 23, 2021 $0.06; Jun 23, 2022 $0.10; Sep 22, 2022 $0.07; Dec 22, 2022 $0.24; Mar 23, 2023 $0.15; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Sep 21, 2023 $0.17; Dec 27, 2023 $0.19; Mar 21, 2024 $0.03; Jun 27, 2024 $0.05; Sep 26, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.21; Mar 6, 2025 $0.06; Jun 5, 2025 $0.12; Sep 4, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.26; Mar 5, 2026 $0.02; Jun 4, 2026 $0.07; Sep 3, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

ENDW vs PWS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025PWS 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025PWS 0.42
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025PWS −24.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61PWS 0.72

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWSBvsGMODA

    Pacer WealthShield ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWSBvsPTBDA

    Pacer WealthShield ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PWSBvsRISNA

    Pacer WealthShield ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.