PTBD ranks 3rd and PWS 6th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs PWS
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.60%0.60%
PTBD 3.0×the volume
18.6K6.13K
PWS +1.7pt
−1.6%+0.1%
PTBD vs PWS Performance
−7.9%+0.7%
- PTBD 0.60%
- PWS 0.60%
- PTBD $83M
- PWS $14M
- PTBD −0.1%, better
- PWS −3.7%
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- PWS 2.14%
- PTBD 1047
- PWS 315
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- PWS 6.13K sh
- PTBD $18.34
- PWS $31.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | PWS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A83 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C50 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | A77 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B56 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and PWS are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
PWSB
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
PWS A tactical fund that takes its cue from the junk-bond market. When high-yield credit and sector momentum turn, PWS rotates between U.S. equity sectors and Treasuries, then re-checks the tape every month.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
PWS The Fund uses a rules-based trend-following strategy to shift exposure between U.S. equity sectors and U.S. Treasury securities. Its monthly evaluations consider high-yield credit conditions, Treasury rates, and momentum in equity sectors and long-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs PWS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs PWS Cost
Same expense ratio
$11,817
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
PWS 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | PWS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,076 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,116 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $11,817 |
- 0.60%PTBD
- 0.60%PWS
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
PWS 8th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs PWS Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- PWS 2.14%
- PTBD $1.17
- PWS $0.68
- PTBD $0.10
- PWS $0.34
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- PWS Sep 3, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- PWS Sep 8, 2026
- PTBD Monthly
- PWS Quarterly
Distribution history
PTBD vs PWS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PTBD
- PWS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%, betterPWS 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08PWS 0.42, better
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%, betterPWS −24.9%
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74PWS 0.72
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.