ENDW ranks 1st and RHTX 46th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
ENDW vs RHTX
ENDW −1.32pt a year
0.22%1.54%
ENDW 45.1×the volume
23.3K517
ENDW vs RHTX Performance
+14.6%+8.7%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- RHTX 1.54%
- ENDW $158M
- RHTX $7M
- ENDW +14.6%, better
- RHTX +8.7%
- ENDW 2.39%
- RHTX
- ENDW 74
- RHTX 6
- ENDW 23.3K sh, better
- RHTX 517 sh
- ENDW $33.62
- RHTX $19.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENDW | RHTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A81Higher | F22 |
| Risk | A72Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | F5 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B65Higher | C53 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. ENDW and RHTX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENDWA
RHTXF
In short
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
RHTX A go-anywhere allocator: it can sit anywhere from all stocks to all bonds, built from plain index ETFs and steered by the adviser's own macro and technical read. Running since 2012.
Stated mandate
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
RHTX The Fund seeks total return from capital appreciation and current income, with a secondary goal of downside protection. It uses tactical asset allocation across equity and fixed-income ETFs and may use alternative-investment ETFs and options for risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENDW vs RHTX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENDW vs RHTX Cost
Overpaying RHTX vs ENDW
$22,289
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
RHTX 1.54%
$26,847
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENDW | RHTX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $2,655 | $2,254 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $9,740 | $8,179 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $26,847 | $22,289 |
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- 1.54%RHTX
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
RHTX 41st cheapest of 46 funds
ENDW vs RHTX Dividends
- ENDW 2.39%
- RHTX
- ENDW $0.82
- RHTX None
- ENDW $0.16
- RHTX
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- RHTX
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- RHTX
- ENDW Quarterly
- RHTX
Distribution history
ENDW vs RHTX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENDW 9.2%RHTX 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ENDW 1.99RHTX 0.82
- Worst fall
- ENDW −6.4%RHTX −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ENDW 0.59RHTX 1.07
ENDW and RHTX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
