Skip to content

ENDW vs RHTX

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

RH Tactical Outlook ETF

RHTXFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −1.32pt a year

ENDW0.22%RHTX1.54%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 45.1×the volume

ENDW23.3KRHTX517

ENDW vs RHTX Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+14.6%ENDW+8.7%RHTX

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. ENDW +14.6%. RHTX +8.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
RHTX 1.54%
Fund size
ENDW $158M
RHTX $7M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.6%, better
RHTX +8.7%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%
RHTX No data
Holdings
ENDW 74
RHTX 6
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 23.3K sh, better
RHTX 517 sh
NAV per share
ENDW $33.62
RHTX $19.08
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 72, Mission 81, Tradability 75, Holdings 61, Durability 65. RHTX: Cost 11, Risk 31, Mission 22, Tradability 5, Holdings 39, Durability 53.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, RHTX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWRHTX
Cost30% weightA100HigherF11
Mission25% weightA81HigherF22
Risk15% weightA72HigherD31
Tradability15% weightA75HigherF5
Holdings10% weightB61HigherD39
Durability5% weightB65HigherC53

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and RHTX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and RHTX 46th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 43FQPXAdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETFScore 23
  4. Rank 46FRHTXRH Tactical Outlook ETFScore 20

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

RHTXFRH Tactical Outlook ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

RHTX A go-anywhere allocator: it can sit anywhere from all stocks to all bonds, built from plain index ETFs and steered by the adviser's own macro and technical read. Running since 2012.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

RHTX The Fund seeks total return from capital appreciation and current income, with a secondary goal of downside protection. It uses tactical asset allocation across equity and fixed-income ETFs and may use alternative-investment ETFs and options for risk management.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • RHTX Can shift 0% to 100% between equity and fixed-income ETFs, with up to 20% in alternatives (REITs, commodities, long/short, global macro) used as a hedge.ncfunds.com
  • Built from mainstream index ETFs, selected on how closely they track large-cap, S&P MidCap 400 and small-cap benchmarks rather than on star-manager picks.ncfunds.com
  • Downside protection is a stated secondary goal, and the adviser may use options on ETFs and equities for risk management.ncfunds.com
  • Trading since 2012, so this tactical mandate has been live through several very different market regimes.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • RHTX Costs 1.54% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (3.50% gross), above the category median and above peers such as ENDW at 0.22%.
  • No index to measure it against. Results hinge on the adviser's technical and macro calls, and the mix can look nothing like a standard 60/40.ncfunds.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the category's heavily traded names.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full RHTX profile⁠

ENDW vs RHTX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs RHTX Cost

Overpaying RHTX vs ENDW

$22,289

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • RHTX 1.54%

    $26,847

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • RHTX 1.54%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530RHTX $26,847ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWRHTXOverpaying
10$401$2,655$2,254
20$1,561$9,740$8,179
30$4,558$26,847$22,289

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.54%RHTX
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

RHTX 41st cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs RHTX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%
RHTX No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
RHTX None
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
RHTX No data
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
RHTX No data
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
RHTX No data
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
RHTX No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
RHTXAll RHTX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ENDW vs RHTX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025RHTX 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025RHTX 0.82
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025RHTX −24.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.59RHTX 1.07

ENDW and RHTX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHTXFvsRISNA

    RH Tactical Outlook ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.54% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPBLA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHTXFvsPBLA

    RH Tactical Outlook ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.54% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHTXFvsPTBDA

    RH Tactical Outlook ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.54% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.