PTBD ranks 3rd and RHTX 46th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs RHTX
PTBD −0.94pt a year
0.60%1.54%
PTBD 35.5×the volume
18.3K517
RHTX +5.9pt
−1.7%+4.2%
PTBD vs RHTX Performance
−8.4%+22.7%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- RHTX 1.54%
- PTBD $83M
- RHTX $7M
- PTBD 0.0%
- RHTX +8.7%, better
- PTBD 6.35%
- RHTX
- PTBD 1060
- RHTX 6
- PTBD 18.3K sh, better
- RHTX 517 sh
- PTBD $18.43
- RHTX $19.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | RHTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F11 |
| Mission | F22 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | C48Higher | F5 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C53 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and RHTX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
RHTXF
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
RHTX A go-anywhere allocator: it can sit anywhere from all stocks to all bonds, built from plain index ETFs and steered by the adviser's own macro and technical read. Running since 2012.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
RHTX The Fund seeks total return from capital appreciation and current income, with a secondary goal of downside protection. It uses tactical asset allocation across equity and fixed-income ETFs and may use alternative-investment ETFs and options for risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs RHTX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs RHTX Cost
Overpaying RHTX vs PTBD
$15,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
RHTX 1.54%
$26,847
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | RHTX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $2,655 | $1,579 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $9,740 | $5,624 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $26,847 | $15,030 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 1.54%RHTX
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
RHTX 41st cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs RHTX Dividends
- PTBD 6.35%
- RHTX
- PTBD $1.17
- RHTX None
- PTBD $0.10
- RHTX
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- RHTX
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- RHTX
- PTBD Monthly
- RHTX
Distribution history
PTBD vs RHTX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PTBD
- RHTX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%, betterRHTX 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08RHTX 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.7%RHTX −24.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74RHTX 1.07
PTBD and RHTX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.54% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
