Skip to content

ENDW vs TUG

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

STF Tactical Growth ETF

TUGBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.43pt a year

ENDW0.22%TUG0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 9.7×the volume

ENDW17.1KTUG1.78K

ENDW vs TUG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+12.1%TUG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. TUG +12.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
TUG 0.65%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
TUG $35M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
TUG +12.1%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
TUG 1.47%
Holdings
ENDW 73
TUG 101
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
TUG 1.78K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
TUG $45.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. TUG: Cost 80, Risk 35, Mission 92, Tradability 25, Holdings 82, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, TUG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWTUG
Cost30% weightA100HigherA80
Mission25% weightA81A92Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherD35
Tradability15% weightB69HigherD25
Holdings10% weightB62A82Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherC43

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and TUG are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and TUG 7th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 7BLEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 7BTUGSTF Tactical Growth ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

TUGBSTF Tactical Growth ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

TUG A trend-following read on the Nasdaq-100: STF's model watches moving averages and shifts the fund between big-tech equity, long-duration Treasuries and T-bills, so the risk-off decision is built into the machinery.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

TUG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • TUG At 0.65% a year it undercuts the typical tactical allocation fund, where 0.95% sits in the middle of the pack.
  • One clear job: the model reads trends in the Nasdaq-100 and dials between index equity, long-duration Treasuries and cash. No black-box asset soup.sec.gov
  • Same engine as sibling TUGN, minus the overlay. TUGN layers on an options spread for income; TUG stays the straight growth version.sec.govsec.gov 2

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • TUG Small asset base and light trading volume. Spreads can widen, so your entry price can matter more than the fee.
  • Trend models trade. The prospectus flags active and frequent trading, which brings turnover, tax friction and whipsaw risk in choppy markets.sec.gov
  • The defensive sleeve leans on long-duration Treasuries, which swing with interest rates rather than parking flat like cash.sec.gov

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full TUG profile⁠

ENDW vs TUG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs TUG Cost

Overpaying TUG vs ENDW

$8,159

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • TUG 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • TUG 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TUG $12,717ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWTUGOverpaying
10$401$1,163$762
20$1,561$4,440$2,879
30$4,558$12,717$8,159

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.65%TUG
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

TUG 10th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs TUG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%, better
TUG 1.47%
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
TUG $0.67
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
TUG $0.00065
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
TUG Jun 25, 2026
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
TUG Jun 26, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
TUG Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
TUGTwice a year · 16 paymentsAll TUG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2022 $0.0098; Sep 21, 2022 $0.09; Dec 21, 2022 $0.14; Mar 22, 2023 $0.10; Jun 21, 2023 $0.04; Sep 20, 2023 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Sep 26, 2024 $0.03; Dec 26, 2024 $1.60; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.01; Sep 24, 2025 $0.0036; Dec 24, 2025 $0.67; Jun 25, 2026 $0.00065. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

ENDW vs TUG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025TUG 16.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025TUG 1.07
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025TUG −22.3%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61TUG 1.24

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsGMODA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsPTBDA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsRISNA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.