GMOD ranks 2nd and TUG 7th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs TUG
GMOD −0.15pt a year
0.50%0.65%
GMOD 6.7×the volume
11.8K1.78K
GMOD vs TUG Performance
+11.8%+12.1%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- TUG 0.65%
- GMOD $49M
- TUG $35M
- GMOD +11.8%
- TUG +12.1%, better
- GMOD
- TUG 1.47%
- GMOD 20
- TUG 101
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- TUG 1.78K sh
- GMOD $27.77
- TUG $45.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | TUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | A80 |
| Mission | A74 | A92Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | B64 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C49Higher | C43 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and TUG are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
TUGB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
TUG A trend-following read on the Nasdaq-100: STF's model watches moving averages and shifts the fund between big-tech equity, long-duration Treasuries and T-bills, so the risk-off decision is built into the machinery.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
TUG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs TUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs TUG Cost
Overpaying TUG vs GMOD
$2,738
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
TUG 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | TUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,163 | $263 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,440 | $980 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $12,717 | $2,738 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 0.65%TUG
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
TUG 10th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs TUG Dividends
- GMOD
- TUG 1.47%
- GMOD
- TUG $0.67
- GMOD $0.14
- TUG $0.00065
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- TUG Jun 25, 2026
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- TUG Jun 26, 2026
- GMOD Twice a year
- TUG Twice a year
Distribution history
GMOD vs TUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%TUG 16.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89TUG 1.07
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%TUG −22.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48TUG 1.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.