Skip to content

GMOD vs TUG

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

STF Tactical Growth ETF

TUGBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.15pt a year

GMOD0.50%TUG0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 6.7×the volume

GMOD11.8KTUG1.78K

GMOD vs TUG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+12.1%TUG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. TUG +12.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
TUG 0.65%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
TUG $35M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%
TUG +12.1%, better
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TUG 1.47%
Holdings
GMOD 20
TUG 101
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
TUG 1.78K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
TUG $45.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. TUG: Cost 80, Risk 35, Mission 92, Tradability 25, Holdings 82, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, TUG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODTUG
Cost30% weightA90HigherA80
Mission25% weightA74A92Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherD35
Tradability15% weightA73HigherD25
Holdings10% weightB64A82Higher
Durability5% weightC49HigherC43

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and TUG are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and TUG 7th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 7BLEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 7BTUGSTF Tactical Growth ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

TUGBSTF Tactical Growth ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

TUG A trend-following read on the Nasdaq-100: STF's model watches moving averages and shifts the fund between big-tech equity, long-duration Treasuries and T-bills, so the risk-off decision is built into the machinery.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

TUG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • TUG At 0.65% a year it undercuts the typical tactical allocation fund, where 0.95% sits in the middle of the pack.
  • One clear job: the model reads trends in the Nasdaq-100 and dials between index equity, long-duration Treasuries and cash. No black-box asset soup.sec.gov
  • Same engine as sibling TUGN, minus the overlay. TUGN layers on an options spread for income; TUG stays the straight growth version.sec.govsec.gov 2

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • TUG Small asset base and light trading volume. Spreads can widen, so your entry price can matter more than the fee.
  • Trend models trade. The prospectus flags active and frequent trading, which brings turnover, tax friction and whipsaw risk in choppy markets.sec.gov
  • The defensive sleeve leans on long-duration Treasuries, which swing with interest rates rather than parking flat like cash.sec.gov

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full TUG profile⁠

GMOD vs TUG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs TUG Cost

Overpaying TUG vs GMOD

$2,738

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • TUG 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • TUG 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TUG $12,717GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODTUGOverpaying
10$900$1,163$263
20$3,460$4,440$980
30$9,979$12,717$2,738

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.65%TUG
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

TUG 10th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs TUG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TUG 1.47%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
TUG $0.67
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
TUG $0.00065
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
TUG Jun 25, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
TUG Jun 26, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
TUG Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
TUGTwice a year · 16 paymentsAll TUG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2022 $0.0098; Sep 21, 2022 $0.09; Dec 21, 2022 $0.14; Mar 22, 2023 $0.10; Jun 21, 2023 $0.04; Sep 20, 2023 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Sep 26, 2024 $0.03; Dec 26, 2024 $1.60; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.01; Sep 24, 2025 $0.0036; Dec 24, 2025 $0.67; Jun 25, 2026 $0.00065. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

GMOD vs TUG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025TUG 16.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025TUG 1.07
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025TUG −22.3%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48TUG 1.24

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsENDWA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsPTBDA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TUGBvsRISNA

    STF Tactical Growth ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.