EWC ranks 1st and ENZL 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
ENZL vs EWC
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
EWC 25.9×the volume
65.1K1.68M
EWC +8.1pt
+3.3%+11.4%
ENZL vs EWC Performance
−21.3%+71.2%
- ENZL 0.50%
- EWC 0.50%
- ENZL $65M
- EWC $7.58B
- ENZL −0.2%
- EWC +21.1%, better
- ENZL 2.26%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- ENZL 29
- EWC 83
- ENZL 65.1K sh
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- ENZL $44.95
- EWC $60.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENZL | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | B55 |
| Mission | C49 | A90Higher |
| Risk | D37 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C47 | A80Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. ENZL and EWC are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENZLC
EWCA
In short
ENZL The rare single-ticker route to New Zealand stocks: a compact basket of about 25 NZ names, run by iShares since 2010. Not a Pacific blend, not Australia with a garnish. Just New Zealand.
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
Stated mandate
ENZL The fund seeks to track an index of New Zealand equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in that single country.
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENZL vs EWC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENZL vs EWC Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENZL 0.50%
$9,979
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENZL | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%ENZL
- 0.50%EWC
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
ENZL 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
ENZL vs EWC Dividends
- ENZL 2.26%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- ENZL $1.01
- EWC $0.75
- ENZL $0.44
- EWC $0.28
- ENZL Jun 15, 2026
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- ENZL Jun 18, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- ENZL Twice a year
- EWC Twice a year
Distribution history
ENZL vs EWC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ENZL
- EWC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENZL 15.1%EWC 13.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ENZL 0.10EWC 1.54, better
- Worst fall
- ENZL −35.9%EWC −24.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ENZL 0.91EWC 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





