GSEW ranks 2nd and EQAL 3rd of 9 funds in the US Equal Weight Category.
EQAL vs GSEW
GSEW −0.11pt a year
0.20%0.09%
GSEW 3.0×the volume
33.7K102K
GSEW +1.4pt
+6.7%+8.1%
EQAL vs GSEW Performance
+38.2%+47.9%
- EQAL 0.20%
- GSEW 0.09%, better
- EQAL $820M
- GSEW $2.19B
- EQAL +16.4%, better
- GSEW +15.9%
- EQAL 1.71%, better
- GSEW 1.39%
- EQAL 1013
- GSEW 498
- EQAL 33.7K sh
- GSEW 102K sh, better
- EQAL $59.12
- GSEW $97.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EQAL | GSEW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C42 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A77 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Equal Weight funds
Same Category. EQAL and GSEW are both graded against the same 9 US Equal Weight funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EQALA
GSEWA
In short
EQAL Most equal-weight funds flatten the stocks and let sector weights land wherever the stock count falls. EQAL flattens the sectors first, then the names inside each one, across roughly 1,000 US large and mid caps.
GSEW Equal weight without the equal-weight markup. GSEW spreads roughly 500 US large caps into same-size slots and charges 0.09%, well under half the typical fee in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
EQAL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index by investing primarily in securities that comprise its underlying index.
GSEW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EQAL vs GSEW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EQAL vs GSEW Cost
Overpaying EQAL vs GSEW
$2,257
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EQAL 0.20%
$4,155
GSEW 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EQAL | GSEW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $165 | $200 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $646 | $775 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,898 | $2,257 |
- 0.20%EQAL
- 0.09%GSEW, cheaper
- Middle half of US Equal Weight funds
- Median 0.20%
GSEW cheapest of 9 funds
EQAL 4th cheapest of 9 funds
EQAL vs GSEW Dividends
- EQAL 1.71%, better
- GSEW 1.39%
- EQAL $1.01
- GSEW $1.34
- EQAL $0.27
- GSEW $0.38
- EQAL Sep 21, 2026
- GSEW Sep 24, 2026
- EQAL Sep 25, 2026
- GSEW Sep 30, 2026
- EQAL Quarterly
- GSEW Quarterly
Distribution history
EQAL vs GSEW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EQAL
- GSEW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EQAL 13.0%GSEW 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EQAL 1.00GSEW 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- EQAL −21.8%, betterGSEW −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EQAL 0.81GSEW 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.