GSEW ranks 2nd and EQL 4th of 9 funds in the US Equal Weight Category.
EQL vs GSEW
GSEW −0.10pt a year
0.19%0.09%
GSEW 2.3×the volume
44.7K102K
EQL +5.0pt
+13.1%+8.1%
EQL vs GSEW Performance
+85.2%+47.9%
- EQL 0.19%
- GSEW 0.09%, better
- EQL $786M
- GSEW $2.19B
- EQL +14.7%
- GSEW +15.9%, better
- EQL 1.29%
- GSEW 1.39%, better
- EQL 498
- GSEW 498
- EQL 44.7K sh
- GSEW 102K sh, better
- EQL $51.91
- GSEW $97.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EQL | GSEW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A74Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C46 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B64 | B69Higher |
Rank among US Equal Weight funds
Same Category. EQL and GSEW are both graded against the same 9 US Equal Weight funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EQLB
GSEWA
In short
EQL Every equal-weight fund levels something. EQL levels sectors: eleven U.S. economic sectors, each handed an equal slice, so no single sector sets the agenda. Running since 2009 at 0.19% a year.
GSEW Equal weight without the equal-weight markup. GSEW spreads roughly 500 US large caps into same-size slots and charges 0.09%, well under half the typical fee in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
EQL EQL passively seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the VettaFi Modelist Equal Weight Sector 500 Index. The index equally weights eleven U.S. economic sectors and float-adjusts stocks within each sector.
GSEW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EQL vs GSEW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EQL vs GSEW Cost
Overpaying EQL vs GSEW
$2,054
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EQL 0.19%
$3,952
GSEW 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EQL | GSEW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $165 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $646 | $705 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,898 | $2,054 |
- 0.19%EQL
- 0.09%GSEW, cheaper
- Middle half of US Equal Weight funds
- Median 0.20%
GSEW cheapest of 9 funds
EQL 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
EQL vs GSEW Dividends
- EQL 1.29%
- GSEW 1.39%, better
- EQL $0.67
- GSEW $1.34
- EQL $0.18
- GSEW $0.38
- EQL Sep 24, 2026
- GSEW Sep 24, 2026
- EQL Sep 29, 2026
- GSEW Sep 30, 2026
- EQL Quarterly
- GSEW Quarterly
Distribution history
EQL vs GSEW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EQL
- GSEW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EQL 10.5%, betterGSEW 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EQL 1.46, betterGSEW 1.21
- Worst fall
- EQL −17.4%, betterGSEW −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EQL 0.73GSEW 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.