GSEW ranks 2nd and EQWL 5th of 9 funds in the US Equal Weight Category.
EQWL vs GSEW
GSEW −0.16pt a year
0.25%0.09%
EQWL 1.03×the volume
105K102K
EQWL +3.5pt
+11.6%+8.1%
EQWL vs GSEW Performance
+73.1%+47.9%
- EQWL 0.25%
- GSEW 0.09%, better
- EQWL $2.85B
- GSEW $2.19B
- EQWL +15.4%
- GSEW +15.9%, better
- EQWL 1.56%, better
- GSEW 1.39%
- EQWL 103
- GSEW 498
- EQWL 105K sh, better
- GSEW 102K sh
- EQWL $132.19
- GSEW $97.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EQWL | GSEW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B57 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Equal Weight funds
Same Category. EQWL and GSEW are both graded against the same 9 US Equal Weight funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EQWLB
GSEWA
In short
EQWL Equal weight, but blue chips only. EQWL spreads money evenly across the roughly 100 mega caps of the S&P 100, so the largest name counts about as much as the hundredth. Running since 2006, before equal weight was fashionable.
GSEW Equal weight without the equal-weight markup. GSEW spreads roughly 500 US large caps into same-size slots and charges 0.09%, well under half the typical fee in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
EQWL The fund seeks to provide exposure to the S&P 100 through an index that gives its constituent securities equal weight, investing at least 90% of assets in index components.
GSEW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EQWL vs GSEW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EQWL vs GSEW Cost
Overpaying EQWL vs GSEW
$3,261
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EQWL 0.25%
$5,159
GSEW 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EQWL | GSEW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $165 | $290 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $646 | $1,123 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $1,898 | $3,261 |
- 0.25%EQWL
- 0.09%GSEW, cheaper
- Middle half of US Equal Weight funds
- Median 0.20%
GSEW cheapest of 9 funds
EQWL 6th cheapest of 9 funds
EQWL vs GSEW Dividends
- EQWL 1.56%, better
- GSEW 1.39%
- EQWL $2.07
- GSEW $1.34
- EQWL $0.51
- GSEW $0.38
- EQWL Sep 21, 2026
- GSEW Sep 24, 2026
- EQWL Sep 25, 2026
- GSEW Sep 30, 2026
- EQWL Quarterly
- GSEW Quarterly
Distribution history
EQWL vs GSEW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EQWL
- GSEW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EQWL 11.1%, betterGSEW 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EQWL 1.47, betterGSEW 1.21
- Worst fall
- EQWL −23.0%, betterGSEW −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EQWL 0.91GSEW 0.91Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.