Skip to content

EQWL vs GSEW

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

EQWLBNYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

GSEWACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GSEW −0.16pt a year

EQWL0.25%GSEW0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

EQWL 1.03×the volume

EQWL105KGSEW102K

5Y return · a year

EQWL +3.5pt

EQWL+11.6%GSEW+8.1%

EQWL vs GSEW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+73.1%EQWL+47.9%GSEW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. EQWL +73.1%. GSEW +47.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EQWL 0.25%
GSEW 0.09%, better
Fund size
EQWL $2.85B
GSEW $2.19B
1Y total return
EQWL +15.4%
GSEW +15.9%, better
Yield (12M)
EQWL 1.56%, better
GSEW 1.39%
Holdings
EQWL 103
GSEW 498
Avg volume (30D)
EQWL 105K sh, better
GSEW 102K sh
NAV per share
EQWL $132.19
GSEW $97.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EQWL: Cost 37, Risk 65, Mission 83, Tradability 93, Holdings 57, Durability 80. GSEW: Cost 88, Risk 43, Mission 100, Tradability 62, Holdings 81, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for EQWL, GSEW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEQWLGSEW
Cost30% weightD37A88Higher
Mission25% weightA83A100Higher
Risk15% weightB65HigherC43
Tradability15% weightA93HigherB62
Holdings10% weightB57A81Higher
Durability5% weightA80HigherB69

Rank among US Equal Weight funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EQWL and GSEW are both graded against the same 9 US Equal Weight funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Equal Weight⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

GSEW ranks 2nd and EQWL 5th of 9 funds in the US Equal Weight Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUSAiShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AGSEWGoldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3AEQALInvesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BEQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BEQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 6BDFVEDoubleLine Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EQWLBInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

GSEWAGoldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

In short

EQWL Equal weight, but blue chips only. EQWL spreads money evenly across the roughly 100 mega caps of the S&P 100, so the largest name counts about as much as the hundredth. Running since 2006, before equal weight was fashionable.

GSEW Equal weight without the equal-weight markup. GSEW spreads roughly 500 US large caps into same-size slots and charges 0.09%, well under half the typical fee in its corner of the market.

Stated mandate

EQWL The fund seeks to provide exposure to the S&P 100 through an index that gives its constituent securities equal weight, investing at least 90% of assets in index components.

GSEW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index.

Why people hold it

  • EQWL Concentration control by design: the index weights its constituents equally, so about 100 household names each carry roughly 1% instead of a few giants steering the whole thing.invesco.com
  • Launched in 2006, it predates most equal-weight rivals and has grown past a billion in assets, making it one of the easier funds to trade in a small category.
  • Fee is 0.25% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028 (0.30% gross), sitting near the median of the nine funds in its equal-weight category.
  • Has tracked its index closely, and distributions arrive quarterly.
  • GSEW 0.09% a year against a 0.20% median for equal-weight US large-cap peers. Only iShares' EUSA matches the price.
  • Every name gets the same slot, so the largest megacap counts no more than the 500th holding. A genuinely different shape than a cap-weighted S&P fund.gsam.com
  • Hugs the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index closely, one of the tightest index implementations in its peer group.
  • Trading since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so this is an established option rather than a recent launch.

Worth knowing

  • EQWL Cheaper equal-weight wrappers exist: EUSA and GSEW each charge 0.09%, and Invesco's own EQAL charges 0.20% for a Russell 1000 version.
  • Equal weight here still means mega caps only, about 100 of them. You are rebalancing among the giants, not reaching down into mid or small caps.
  • Resetting to equal weight trims whatever has run hottest, so results diverge from the cap-weighted S&P 100 in both directions.
  • GSEW Even weights pull the mix toward the smaller members of the large-cap universe and away from megacap concentration, which has made for a bumpier ride than cap-weighted peers.
  • Resetting to equal weight means more turnover than a leave-it-alone cap-weighted index, and income lands quarterly rather than monthly.
  • Moderately traded, not one of the volume giants of the category, so spreads can widen outside the busiest parts of the session.

Full EQWL profile⁠

Full GSEW profile⁠

EQWL vs GSEW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EQWL vs GSEW Cost

Overpaying EQWL vs GSEW

$3,261

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EQWL 0.25%

    $5,159

  • GSEW 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EQWL 0.25%
  • GSEW 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530EQWL $5,159GSEW $1,898

Year by year

YearEQWLGSEWOverpaying
10$455$165$290
20$1,769$646$1,123
30$5,159$1,898$3,261

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%EQWL
  • 0.09%GSEW, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Equal Weight funds
  • Median 0.20%

GSEW cheapest of 9 funds

EQWL 6th cheapest of 9 funds

EQWL vs GSEW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EQWL 1.56%, better
GSEW 1.39%
Payout (12M)
EQWL $2.07
GSEW $1.34
Last payment
EQWL $0.51
GSEW $0.38
Ex-dividend
EQWL Sep 21, 2026
GSEW Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
EQWL Sep 25, 2026
GSEW Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
EQWL Quarterly
GSEW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EQWLQuarterly · 38 paymentsAll EQWL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 38 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.22; Sep 18, 2017 $0.19; Dec 18, 2017 $0.26; Mar 19, 2018 $0.17; Jun 18, 2018 $0.28; Sep 24, 2018 $0.30; Dec 24, 2018 $0.34; Mar 18, 2019 $0.22; Jun 24, 2019 $0.30; Sep 23, 2019 $0.35; Dec 23, 2019 $0.39; Mar 23, 2020 $0.34; Jun 22, 2020 $0.33; Sep 21, 2020 $0.35; Dec 21, 2020 $0.36; Mar 22, 2021 $0.33; Jun 21, 2021 $0.30; Sep 20, 2021 $0.37; Dec 20, 2021 $0.42; Mar 21, 2022 $0.41; Jun 21, 2022 $0.41; Sep 19, 2022 $0.39; Dec 19, 2022 $0.38; Mar 20, 2023 $0.44; Jun 20, 2023 $0.41; Sep 18, 2023 $0.43; Dec 18, 2023 $0.45; Mar 18, 2024 $0.47; Jun 24, 2024 $0.48; Sep 23, 2024 $0.49; Dec 23, 2024 $0.47; Mar 24, 2025 $0.53; Jun 23, 2025 $0.44; Sep 22, 2025 $0.48; Dec 22, 2025 $0.52; Mar 23, 2026 $0.53; Jun 22, 2026 $0.51; Sep 21, 2026 $0.51. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
GSEWQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll GSEW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.23; Mar 23, 2018 $0.14; Jun 25, 2018 $0.16; Sep 24, 2018 $0.18; Dec 24, 2018 $0.13; Mar 25, 2019 $0.23; Jun 24, 2019 $0.20; Sep 24, 2019 $0.19; Dec 24, 2019 $0.22; Mar 25, 2020 $0.28; Jun 24, 2020 $0.20; Sep 24, 2020 $0.20; Dec 24, 2020 $0.20; Mar 25, 2021 $0.18; Jun 24, 2021 $0.22; Sep 24, 2021 $0.20; Dec 27, 2021 $0.36; Mar 25, 2022 $0.15; Jun 24, 2022 $0.27; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 27, 2022 $0.47; Mar 27, 2023 $0.15; Jun 26, 2023 $0.28; Sep 25, 2023 $0.23; Dec 26, 2023 $0.44; Mar 22, 2024 $0.18; Jun 24, 2024 $0.29; Sep 24, 2024 $0.25; Dec 23, 2024 $0.40; Mar 25, 2025 $0.24; Jun 24, 2025 $0.33; Sep 24, 2025 $0.35; Dec 23, 2025 $0.37; Mar 25, 2026 $0.27; Jun 24, 2026 $0.31; Sep 24, 2026 $0.38. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

EQWL vs GSEW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • EQWL
  • GSEW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GSEW −25.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EQWL 11.1%, betterGSEW 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EQWL 1.47, betterGSEW 1.21
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EQWL −23.0%, betterGSEW −25.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EQWL 0.91GSEW 0.91Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • EQWLBvsEUSAA

    Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSEWAvsEUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EQWLBvsEQALA

    Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSEWAvsEQALA

    Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EQWLBvsEQLB

    Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSEWAvsEQLB

    Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.