ERX ranks 1st and GUSH 2nd of 6 funds in the 2x/3x Long Energy Category.
ERX vs GUSH
ERX −0.03pt a year
0.91%0.94%
GUSH 2.4×the volume
287K685K
ERX +27.1pt
−6.3%−33.4%
ERX vs GUSH Performance
+363.0%+105.0%
- ERX 0.91%, better
- GUSH 0.94%
- ERX $287M
- GUSH $226M
- ERX +140.9%, better
- GUSH +134.2%
- ERX 1.08%, better
- GUSH 0.93%
- ERX 28
- GUSH 60
- ERX 287K sh
- GUSH 685K sh, better
- ERX $124.23
- GUSH $49.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ERX | GUSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74Higher | B61 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C53Higher | C48 |
Rank among 2x/3x Long Energy funds
Same Category. ERX and GUSH are both graded against the same 6 2x/3x Long Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ERXB
GUSHC
In short
ERX The 2008 original of the leveraged energy trade: 2x the daily move of the Energy Select Sector Index, built from oil-major stocks rather than crude futures. Sector-wide exposure, dialed up, for holding periods measured in days.
GUSH A 2x bet on the drillers, not the barrel. GUSH aims for 200% of the daily move of an S&P index of oil and gas exploration and production stocks, resetting every single close.
Stated mandate
ERX The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index for a single day. It is not designed to deliver twice the index’s cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
GUSH The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ERX vs GUSH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ERX vs GUSH Cost
Overpaying GUSH vs ERX
$497
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ERX 0.91%
$17,207
GUSH 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ERX | GUSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,610 | $1,661 | $51 |
| 20 | $6,076 | $6,260 | $184 |
| 30 | $17,207 | $17,704 | $497 |
- 0.91%ERX, cheaper
- 0.94%GUSH
- Middle half of 2x/3x Long Energy funds
- Median 0.94%
ERX 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
GUSH 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
ERX vs GUSH Dividends
- ERX 1.08%, better
- GUSH 0.93%
- ERX $1.39
- GUSH $0.48
- ERX $0.37
- GUSH $0.15
- ERX Sep 22, 2026
- GUSH Sep 22, 2026
- ERX Sep 29, 2026
- GUSH Sep 29, 2026
- ERX Quarterly
- GUSH Quarterly
Distribution history
ERX vs GUSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ERX
- GUSH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ERX 43.5%, betterGUSH 53.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ERX 0.77, betterGUSH 0.41
- Worst fall
- ERX −46.9%, betterGUSH −73.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ERX −0.03GUSH 0.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.91% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.